R.M. COURT.—This Day.

Auckland Star, Volume XXVI, Issue 4517, 20 November 1884, Page 2

R.M. COURT.—This Day.

(Before H. G. Seth Smith, Esq., R.M.) UNDEEBNDED CASES. In the following cases judgment went for the plaintiffs by default on the part of the defendants :—T. P. Slinn v. Jas. Clarke, Ll3 2s Sd: Hancock and Co. v. Dr. Hovell, 22a 6d; Jas. Wiseman v. VVra. Green, 29s 6d : W. S. Jones v. J. Lee,Ll2 10a Od; Auokland Timber Co. v. W. J. Quigley, L2l9s Id : Brown, Barrott, nnd Co. v. D. McLennan, Lli 7s 9d; J. A. Beale v. Henry Smith, LI lls 6d; • ' ADJOURNED. F. W. Wright v. X Worth, 18a 6d; R. Farrell v. A. Nicholson, L 3 lls 7d; same v. E. Hunter, L 4 as 6d; JC. Binuey v. N. King, L 2 19a 6d; Ja* Mclntjrev.GrayandDnnn.L4l3a; J. Wadde'l v". F. J. Murray, LI 9s lOd ; Joynt and another V Bessie Duwkins, L 10; Union Sash and Door Co. v. J. K. Haiiday, LlO 33 lOd; J. L. Evans v. J. llempsey.jun., LBUs6d; A. Buckland v. J. T Cole, Ll9 0a lid: Oilioial Assignoo v. JV H. Jenkins, L 57 8s; E. J. Clavell v. Henry Dixon. L 9 Ha; Gnrlick and anothtr' v. W. Clarke L 6 7s IH ; same v. W. V. Stevens, Ll2 15s 3d; M. Monaghan v. P. Poacocke.LiO 15s; S. Cohon v. W. Frceney. L 3 lls; Lewis Moses v. H. Williamson, L 27 53; Henry Dustin v. J. Slater, L 7 17s Gd ; J. King v. Bridget Quinlan, L2B 7s Od; B. 11. Koosing v. VV. Clarke, L 3 6s. JUDGMENT SUMMONS CASES. Thas. Gillan v, IT. Kirkwood.-Claim, L 34 (g. -^By consent, debtor ordered to pay Instalments o£ LI pc? month; in default, one month's imprisonment. ■ F. Hull, jun.. v. W. Buchanan.—Claim, L 32 7?. —Oidered to pay at rato of L 3 per month; one month in default. K. Cowan v. W. Andrews.—Claim, L 7 2s lid. —Payment at rato of 2s 6d per week ordered • in dofault, 10 days. ■J. King V. G. A. Clark.—Claim. L 7 5s 6d.— Payment ordered by Ist Decomhor; 10 tlays in dofault ': ■ ■ .. Samo v. A. 0. Field.—Claim, L 2 lps.—Debtor consented to an order for 7s per week; in dofault, five days. ■ " : < 'L. D. Nathan & Co. v. W. L. Green.-Claim, Ll3 17s.—Payment ordered at rate of LI per week; 14 days in default. Thomas- Murcher v. 11. Norgrove.—Claim, L3I Gs (id. -Ordered to pay at rate of 10s per week; one month in default. M. Carr v. B. A. Burgess.—Claim, L 5 Gs.— Orderod to payat rate, of 10s per week; seven days in default. ■ J. Leydon v. J. Fraser.—Claim, L2los.—Paymentordered at rato of 10s a week; five days in default. B. Williams v. John Dobney.—Claim. L 3 9a.— The debtor deposed thathe.was telegraph linesman in receipt o£ wages not exceeding LBper month.—Ordered to pay at the rate of 53 per week; in default, 7 days' imprisonment. L. Moses v. J. P. Bindon. — Claim, L-. Ordered to pay on or before lith January next • in default, 14 days. Peel and Co. v. Thos. Kelly.-Claim. L 9 Bs.Ordered to pay within a fortnight; 14 days in default, Auokland Timber Co. V. Elllott-Olaim. L3l 10s 2d.-p<jyment ordered of half the amount claimed within a month, and the balance within a month thereafter; in default, one month. DEPENDED CASES. tio IslU\ Ai Uck!and Gas Company.-Claim, ™T;MrW. J. Napier for plaintiff, and Mr C. F Buddlo for defendant,—Tlio case had been previously heard, and Hits Worship now gave iudi?. mont. Ho hold that there had been no evidence of malice, but only of amistake, andconsequently the plaintiff had no right of action under thn circumstances. He would nonsuit tho plaintiff without costs, the plaintiff taking the sum that had boen paid into Court. ■ . , Wm. Wright v.R. W. Johnston.-Claira. 22s 6d, work and labour done. The claim was and judgmonfgiven accordingly.