Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WELLINGTON.

(From our own Correspondent.) This day. The Hutt Meeting. There are letters in the papers yet quarrelling about the last Hutt meeting, as to whether it was really in favour of abolition or against it; but the, evidence is so conflicting that it is next to impossible to side entirely with either. The Post's report made out that the New Zealand Times' report told a fib. The Tribune, of course, agreed with the Times, and each paper had its own reporter present. The papers themselves bad a slaDging match over it, and each backs its own reporter. Sitting on the Rail. The Tribune last night wants to know what the Times means. Any way it says it ought to be one thins; or the other (which, by the way, it is not being neither, fis'a, flesh, nor good red herring), and that letting "Idarenotwaitupon I would," is neithergood for the Times nor for anyone else. 111-natured people say that the Times is an exact counter-picture of the mind of the member for Eden—at present a piece of elegant oscillation.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS18750903.2.16.5

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume VI, Issue 1730, 3 September 1875, Page 3

Word Count
180

WELLINGTON. Auckland Star, Volume VI, Issue 1730, 3 September 1875, Page 3

WELLINGTON. Auckland Star, Volume VI, Issue 1730, 3 September 1875, Page 3