THE LATE ARSON CASE.

Auckland Star, Volume VI, Issue 1626, 3 May 1875, Page 2

THE LATE ARSON CASE.

(To the Editor of the Stab.)

Sir, —Taking your motto for my guidance, " The wrong that needs resistance," I hope you will allow me space for a few words in your journal, which is always foremost in defendiug the oppressed. On the night of the fire in my house, I was the first who discovered it and gave the alarm, and it was principally owing to my exertions, together with the aid of Mr Syms, that a whole block of buildinss was saved from destruction. This could be proved by Mr Syms, who was the first person to enter the house : a man of respectability and standing, who saw me in a nude state trying to extinguish the fire. Still this gentleman, who should be the first witness in the caße, was not required by the prosecution, although they were informed of the fact. And why ; was he not required T Simply because he could have told the truth Truth is seldom wanted when a conviction is

required ; and even taken for granted the whole facts of the case to be true, as heard in Court, was that sufficient grounds for the action taken by the police in refusing admittance to my wife and family into their own house. This was denied in Court, but such has been the case, as could easily be proved. Further, they retain possession of my workshop for three days, and when handed over, half my tools are missing, and no satisfaction is given about them, lam simply told they did not steal them, and the Insurance Company refuse to pay for them. I would ask, who is responsible ? Surely the police, when so smart on one side, shottld not be lukewarm on the other. I believe it is their duty to protect property. I could say more, but Ido not wish to occupy your time.—l am, sir, your'a respectfully, George D. Burke:.

May 3, 1875.