Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE DEAN CONSPIRACY CASE.

Press Association—By Telegraph—Copyright. Sydney, December 4. In the conspiracy trial, counsel for the defence cross-examined a Crown witness named Gail at length with a view of proving that the expenses of the solicitor engaged to defend him in the bigamy proceedings brought by his wife were paid by the Crown so as to secure him in this case. Gail admitted that the major portion of his expenses were not paid out of his own pocket, but by the proceeds of a Treasury note, which was handed to him at the Treasury. He, however, denied that the Crown was paying the expenses or that any arrangement had been made between the Attorney-General and his solicitor as suggested by counsel for the defence.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP18951205.2.32.5

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LII, Issue 9281, 5 December 1895, Page 5

Word Count
125

THE DEAN CONSPIRACY CASE. Press, Volume LII, Issue 9281, 5 December 1895, Page 5

THE DEAN CONSPIRACY CASE. Press, Volume LII, Issue 9281, 5 December 1895, Page 5