Page image

H.—36

8

No. 4 Mr. Back to the Hon. Major Atkinson. Re Court of Inquiry on Charges preferred against Captain Howe, Engineer Militia. Audit Office, 13th May, 1875. The attached muster roll shows both Baskeville and Flynn to have been on duty from 23rd to 27th September inclusive, and to have gone on pass on the 28th September. The muster roll is certified by Captain Howe. In acquittance roll (voucher 4-6440) Baskeville and Elynn are each paid five days' pay, 23rd to 27th September inclusive. Eeceipts acknowledged by Captain Eowe; authorities in proper form. The acquittance roll bears the following certificate: — " I certify that the individuals named in the foregoing account were actually employed in the situation and during the period specified opposite the name of each respectively. "Henet T. Eowe, " Captain in charge." With reference to the explanation of Captain Eowe, that he adjusted the stoppage with the Paymaster to credit of the Government (page 29), and to Mr. Oldrey's statement that Captain Bowe's explanation was satisfactory to him as Paymaster to the corps (page 32 of proceedings), it would appear that in March (voucher 46047) seven days' pay was stopped from sapper D. E. Smith for uniform, the said sapper having earned a full period's paj'. It may be inferred that Captain Eowe paid the difference to Smith out of the money stopped from Baskeville and Elynn. On the other hand, there is nothing to show that the stoppage from Smith was not a legitimate stoppage for clothing issued to him on contractor's account. It will be observed that Mr. Oldrey does not detail Captain Eowe's explanation. Further, it may be remarked that, under any circumstances, the certificates to the acquittance sheet and muster rolls under Captain Eowe's hand were not in accordance with fact. That Captain Eowe drew from the Paymaster money which had never been earned by the men from whom he procured orders; and the accounts were passed on the strength of his certificate. In the audit of pay sheets, the certificate of the officer is looked upon as a guarantee that the money has been earned, in the same manner as the certificate to a voucher for supplies that the goods have been delivered. The Paymaster's clerk would appear to be much to blame, as had he not sanctioned the irregularity complained of, it could not have occurred. To stop men's pay for stores which they not only have not been supplied with, but which were not even in the possession of the corps, nor indeed in existence, is a most unusual proceeding. With reference to the objection of the stoppage of £1 per man, Captain Eowe, in reply to a question by the Court (page 27 of proceedings), states : —" Mr. Oldrey, the pay clerk of the Public Works Department, made them wait until the remainder of the company were paid, when he explained to them that the money was retained in the hands of the Government, and would not bo paid to the tailor until I gave authority to do so." The question might be asked, In whose hands was the money which was stopped for uniform, and how long elapsed before the whole of it was paid to the tailor ? Notwithstanding the finding of the Board, it may be noticed that Captain Eowe admits that he placed men on pay to whom no pay was due. That he appended untrue certificates both to the acquittance sheets and muster rolls is self-evident. The money drawn by Captain Eowe on account of the two absent men was retained by him from October to February, when, with the connivance of the pay clerk, he attempted to square the matter. Captain Eowe cannot be justified, as far as can be learnt from evidence, in retaining the money for four months, on the plea that it was to pay the tailor for uniform, as it is clearly shown that no uniform was issued to either Baskeville or Flynn, they having left before the uniform was made. Fred. Back. The Hon. Major Atkinson, &c, &c.

No. 5. Lieut.-Colonel Lyon to Captain Eowe. (Telegram). Government Buildings, 17th May, 1875. I am directed by the Hon. Major Atkinson (acting for the Native Minister) to inform you that he considers the evidence given at the late Court of Inquiry is so very unsatisfactory that the Government dispense with your services from this date ; and His Excellency the Governor will be advised to cancel your commission. You will hand over the command to Captain Schofield. I have, &c, William C. Lyon, Lieut.-Colonel, Captain Eowe, Ngaruawahia. . Acting Under Secretary Defence.

No. 6. The Hon. Major Atkinson to Major Goedon. Sir,— Wellington, 26th May, 1875. I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of the proceedings of the Court of Inquiry held by you to investigate certain charges preferred against Captain Eowe, Engineer Volunteer Militia, and to inform you that I have perused them with no little astonishment, both on account of the manner in which you took the evidence, and at the conclusion at which you have arrived. The first charge relates to the sale of a Government mare.

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert