THE REV. CANON STOWELL'S STRICTURES UPON THE ENGLISH SETTLERS IN NEW ZEALAND.

Wellington Independent, Volume XVI, Issue 1704, 4 March 1862, Page 5

THE REV. CANON STO WELL'S STRICTURES UPON THE ENGLISH SETTLERS IN NEW ZEALAND.

{From the S. M. Herald 14/:/* Feb.) To. the Editor of the Herald,

Sir. — As the New Zealand question has to a great extent secured the attention and awakened the sympathies of the public of rMew South Wales, you will, I have no doubt, oblige me by printing for their information the enclosed copy of a letter to the Rev. Canon Stowell, D.D., of Manchester, which I forwarded to his address by the January mail. I am, yours, faithfully, SAMUEL IRONSIDE. Newtown, llth February. The Rev. Canon Stowell, D.D., Manchester, England. Newtown, Sydney, New South Wales* 18th January, 1862

Reverend Sir, — A friend of mine has kindly sent me a copy of the Mona's Herald for November 13th, 1861, which contains a leading article entitled. 'The Rev, Canon Stowell upon New Zealand." In that article is an extract from a speech of yours at the Church Missionary Society's meeting, held in Douglas in November last. The extraot is as follows: — ''But who brought on the trouble that has recently overtaken New Zealand? The grasping and unfair, and oppressive emigrants. How did they treat the poor natives ? The way the hunters of India treat the wild bears — cut them up. Alas! alas! that British civilisation should so far forget itself. New Zealand is not a conquered country, and we cannot tread it down with the heel of oppression. Christianity brought New Zealand under the sceptre of Britain's shield, and it must have fair play. The emigrants, the vagabonds of our country — must not be allowed to hew down the poor aborigines, and oppress them as they have done, taking their land to a large extent from them ; and then when the poor natives turn round to defend themselves, they are called rebels and savages. Do not form hasty opinions about poor aborigines," &c, &c.

'T have lived twenty years in New Zealand in the capacity of a Wesleyau Methodist Missionary — am tolerably conversant with the language and habits of

natives — was iv and out among the poor < people during many of their wars, and i yield to none in a sincere desire for their I welfare. I consider this statement i necessary before I say anything iv reply i to your speech. 1 know not, Sir, from i whouce you have derived your information I but I assure you it is wholly incorrect. I The emigrants have not been "grasping ] and unfair, and oppressive." That they I have treated "the poor natives the way the hunters of India treat the wild boars — cut them off," is as pure and uumiligated a falsehood as was ever invented. I feel deeply sorry that you should have been so imposed upon. During thewliole of my twenty years experience in that country I cannot call to mind more than one instance of murder of natives by a white man. Not an acre of land has ever been purchased from the natives except at their own repeated request, and by the free consent, as far as could be ascertained, of every individual owner. They have now millions of acres of land unappropriated, not one tithe of which they can ever cultivate. This land has been a fruitful source of quarrel, bloodshed and violence, among themselves ; and the quietly-disposed among them la;menting over evils which they cannot remedy — via. the unceasing strife among the various tribes about ownership and boundaries — would gladly alienate the laud to the Crown, being sure of equitable payment for all they sold, large reserves for themselves and families, and the presence of English emigrants, who would be a guarantee of peace and quietness, and also furnish an excellent market for all the produce they could raise. If the Queen could purchase their lands it would be an inestimable blessiug to themselves, by removing this fruitful source of war and strife. But the violent and disorderly among them not only refuse to sell lauds of which they re themselves omiers, but resolutely prevent their neighbours from selling theirs. The noted William Kingi, in open conference with the District Commissioner, is asked by him if the land in dispute belongs to the parties offering it for sale. He replies. "Yes, the laud is theirs; but / will not let them sell it." In 1854 these violent men cruelly and in cold blood murdered seven of their fellow natives, who uuarmed, were engaged in cutting the boundaries of a piece of laud which they wished Government to bny. If the Governor had had it in his power to punish those murderers as they deserved, I believe the present war would have been prevented. But they escaped through the weakness of Government, aud ever since the lawless and turbulent have done things of this kind with impunity. It is really too bad to charge the unoffending settlers with beiug "grasping and unfair, and oppressive," They are in no way responsible for the war, which is an Imperial question, but have, many of them, suffered the loss of all. Husbands, aud sons, and fathers, and even] little children, have been cruelly murdered. The houses of the settlers are burnt ; their pretty English homesteads, in which they had invested their all, and on which they had expended years of toil and sacrifice, are utterly laid waste by an unprincipled mob of natives ; and after all they, the settlers, are spoken of by a dignitary of the Church of England" in such terms of undeserved scandal and reproach. Sir, the emigrants of New Zealand are, as a body, wholly innocent of your censures. They are, and have been, honourable in their dealings with the natives. In fact, at Taranaki and its neighbourhood they dare not be otherwise, for they have been at the mercy of the natives. Government for years past has been powerless to repress and punish native crime. Trespasses by native cattle and horses upon the cultivations of settlers have been of necessity overlooked while the settler's horse or cow wandering upon the unfenced land of the natives has been in many instances shot down or barbarously hacked with the tomahawk. I speak, Sir, of things coming under my own notice, as a missionary, I lived from 1855 to 1858 in Taranaki, where the late unhappy war raged ; aud was an eye-witness of the patience with which the settlers there bore repeated instances of autrage and insult, and wrong at the hands of the natives. I hope I shall not be chargeable with want of sympathy with the natives of New Zealaud in thus writing, I have given evidence of my sincere desire for their welfare during many years of toil and sacrifice among them j and. were I younger iv years, and able to endure the the toil and exposure, 1 would gladly go back and labour and die among them. But I cannot justify the rebellious intheir pseseni course, and I cannot allow tbe emigrants to New Zealand to be charged with faults of which they are wholly innocent, without replying to-thoss charges I am, Reverend Sir, yours very faithfully. SAMUEL IRONSIDE. P.S. — I ought further to say that from the first the settlers had nothing at all to do with the alienation of native lands. By the terms of the Waitangi Treaty, February 1840 the purchase from natives is exclusively with the Governor.