Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

IMPAIR PRACTICE

BY SOME LAND AGENTS

SOLDIERS AND THEIR J)EPOS I TS. The Commissioner of Crown Lunds for Canterbury (Mr. 11. D. M. Haszard; lias issued a warning that he will publish the names of certain land agents ii they persist i'n their jiractice of calling upon discharged soldiers to forfeit deposits paid upon house properties for the purchase of which no Government

advance is granted. When a discharged soldier seeks Go-vc-rumeut assistance in the purchase oi a house, lie first secures an option oyer a place, then applies to the Lands Department to have his case recommended to the Minister for Lands for an ad va.ucie. As a rule, le is required to pay a deposit on the house. In some agreements. the soldier stipulates that such

deposit is to he returned it his application flir an advance is not granted; but where such a stipulation is not made, some agents are laying claim to the deposit if die purchase is (not confirmed in the soldier. Some observations upon this position were made by Mr Ha-szard at tin 1 opening of a slitting of the Canterbury Land Board this week. “We find,’*' said the Commissioner, “that, in a ‘number o‘ cases, vendors and ageiats are demanding rather heavy deposits from the soldier, and. unless l e makes a specific stipulation that, in the event of the board not being able to recommend the advance this deposit should bo returned, we find that some ol these people are claiming the forfeiture

of the deposit. I should like publicity ■given to that, so that soldiers may know the position, unless the advalnee they are asking for is granted by the Government, their deposit should be retm'ned. “It is not a fair positllm to place.the soldiers in, that what little money they have should be foifeited by way of deposit. Of course., we' fill'd that some agents act in a very lair way, and do

not make any question about returning the deposit when they find that, for some rcas’on or other, the application for an advance cannot bo forwarded to the Minister. Unfortunately, in some eases, the reverse lias taken place, and I think that, in the event of any Such cases in the future, I shall have to give publicity to the names of agents acting 'in that manner.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WHDT19200401.2.26

Bibliographic details

Waihi Daily Telegraph, Volume XVII, Issue 5877, 1 April 1920, Page 2

Word Count
389

IMPAIR PRACTICE Waihi Daily Telegraph, Volume XVII, Issue 5877, 1 April 1920, Page 2

IMPAIR PRACTICE Waihi Daily Telegraph, Volume XVII, Issue 5877, 1 April 1920, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert