Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE COURTS.

Extraordinary Defence in a

Divorce Case.

(Per United Prese Association.)

CHRISTCHURCHr Nov. 19,

In the divorce case—Livingstone v. Livingstone—at tho Supreme Court, yesterday, the solicitor for the respondent stated that he had been instructed to raise a defepce of collusion; the respondent, however, would admit adultery. The Judge said he would allow the defence to be filed, as he thought it was unique, but was most extraordinary, and he had gravo doubts if collusion could be proved undor the circumstances. It was tho first case of the kind he had "ever heard of.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WH19011119.2.34

Bibliographic details

Wanganui Herald, Volume XXXV, Issue 10497, 19 November 1901, Page 2

Word Count
95

THE COURTS. Wanganui Herald, Volume XXXV, Issue 10497, 19 November 1901, Page 2

THE COURTS. Wanganui Herald, Volume XXXV, Issue 10497, 19 November 1901, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert