Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PLAINTIFF WINS CASE AGAINST ASHBURTON COUNTY COUNCIL.

Per Press Association. WELLINGTON, April 26. The Full Court in the case of Stoddart v. Ashburton County Council decided that the judgment for plaintiff for £1250 and costs should stand. The Court held that once it was established that a local authority did something to a road and the case was removed from the category of nonfeasance, then, if the work was imperfect and complete it became a case of misfeasance, although the danger was caused by an omission to do something that should have been done. The County Council had to exercise reasonable care, but the jury had found that this had not been done and the evidence supported the finding of the jury on this question.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19260426.2.56

Bibliographic details

Star (Christchurch), Issue 17830, 26 April 1926, Page 5

Word Count
125

PLAINTIFF WINS CASE AGAINST ASHBURTON COUNTY COUNCIL. Star (Christchurch), Issue 17830, 26 April 1926, Page 5

PLAINTIFF WINS CASE AGAINST ASHBURTON COUNTY COUNCIL. Star (Christchurch), Issue 17830, 26 April 1926, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert