Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TO BE DISCUSSED AGAIN.

TRADE TREATY WITH AUSTRALIA. CANADA’S POSITION. lie liter's Telegrams OTTAWA, April 27. Mr Meighan read in Parliament a Melbourne Press despatch quoting Mr Bruce’s latest utterance on the Australia 11-Can adian Treat y. The Premier (Mr W. \j.. Mackenzie IvingV, commenting on this., said lie would not make any statement based oti newspaper reports, bub he added that the last communication from Mr Bruce inquired regarding certain proposed changes by Canada, which communication had not yet been answered. Mr Klug added that until the question ui' the amount of material of British origin had been settled, Canada did not propose to make any changes in her own tariff. Mr King then announced that Mr D. H. Boss, former trade .eom--1 mistsioner to Australia, was being momvealtb in an endeavour to straighten out the tangle over the treaty. Mr King said that after the Commonwealth Parliament made certain changes in the treaty an Order-in-Council was passed providing that to avail of the Australian preference, 75 per cent of British material and labour must enter into an exported article. This proposal had been discussed during the negotiations. Mr King said:—“Me do not propose to ask the House to sanction the treaty until wo get this phase remedied. Mr Boss will conduct further negotiations and we hope the matter in dispute will be arranged .satisfactorily/’ Mr Meighan retorted: I would gather there is no hope of legislation this session? Mr’King replied: T must not say that. I rather hope there will. Various Opposition members then expressed the view that the 75 per cent, proviso was wrongly interpreted, and that its application would' not appreciably affect Canadian exports. Members, moreover, intimated that there were other matters than the 75 per cent, proviso that were delaying the ratification of the treaty. Mr King dissented, and the discussion ended.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19250429.2.108

Bibliographic details

Star (Christchurch), Issue 17524, 29 April 1925, Page 11

Word Count
307

TO BE DISCUSSED AGAIN. Star (Christchurch), Issue 17524, 29 April 1925, Page 11

TO BE DISCUSSED AGAIN. Star (Christchurch), Issue 17524, 29 April 1925, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert