Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Botany in the Schools

The schoolmaster is abroad, but evidently he does not discharge his duties satisfactorily, for a gentleman has found it necessary to educate our eduoators on the subject of botanical lessons. At last meeting of the Board of Education, the secretary produced a letter, which he paid he had been unable to decipher, though he could read the concluding words of it—' Send the letter to press. 1 The Board agreed to comply with the writer's request and the puzzling MS. was handed to the OM. With the aid of the ' devil,' we have managed to decipher the undecipherable (which is just scarcely so illegible as Mr Kice's educated scrawl) and we have pleasure in presenting a few choice extracts to our readers. The name of the writer even we were unable to decipher, but he writes from Karioi, under date 28th Sept. as follows : —

More than a year ago, an order was ishued by the board that in all shools botany should be tanght ; still I cannot see that such is dono anywhere. All there is about it is that teachers talk about it in the shoolroom. Can a man become a swimmer if he does not go in to the watter ?no ! i?'o can a child not become a botanist if not took out in nature, . . . Oure shools kost more tan righu as it is. Nobody here is so well payed as the shoolmaster. Oure shoolmasters are all made of such stuff as would give a good tailor and not fit for such, tings. Oure children can eat watercresse if ihe have no cabage. . . . Yea ;it wouli be better for them to go out on fine weather than ait penned up in lha shoolroom. All I can see government shoo s are disgusting the way they_ are worked on, and private shools are too expensiv. . . . Botany should be 1 aught in shools. children should be toofc out in fields, naatur's gardens, bush, swwarap and all other places *hey could be taken to from the plough to the shearing shed— from the plu to the sheeves and were it would be done ; to mines. As each shooi has a garden, they can see the- germination and thus obtain a knowledge of the culinary and. vegetable fit for the citchen would be given them and shools com-' piting with ich other — not a penny expense. Who wants to become a swimmer must go in to the watter, and a, botanist in the field. Send the letter to press. ,■'. ,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TO18911010.2.19.8

Bibliographic details

Observer, Volume xi, Issue 667, 10 October 1891, Page 9

Word Count
421

Botany in the Schools Observer, Volume xi, Issue 667, 10 October 1891, Page 9

Botany in the Schools Observer, Volume xi, Issue 667, 10 October 1891, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert