“WHY SHOULD I NOT NAME HIM?”
SCENE AT STAVISKY TRIAL FRENCH PRIME MINISTER INVOLVED United Press Association—By Electric Telegraph—Copyright (Received November 7, 7.35 p.m.) PARIS, November 6. The name of M. Laval (Prime Minister of France) was linked with that of the murdered Judge Prince by M. Bardi de Fourtu, in an outburst from the dock at the Stavisky trial. Accused of allowing Stavisky to “window dress” prospectuses with his name, M. de Fourtu, who is a former cavalry general, shouted: “How could I not have full confidence in Stavisky, seeing that a highly placed personality, who to-day occupies a still higher position—why should I not name him, M. Laval —intervened with Judge Prince, then Director of Financial Prosecutions, to stop a certain prosecution against Stavisky?” The Prosecutor revealed that inquiries had not yet closed, and further prosecutions would follow without fear or favour. Hayoite, a former secretary of Stavisky, accused the French banker, Senator Baron Maurice de Rothschild, of tricking Stavisky in a £20,000 deal in yearling horses. He further declared that jewels from Ethiopia were entrusted to Stavisky by a company of which Emperor Haile Selassie was honorary president.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THD19351108.2.61
Bibliographic details
Timaru Herald, Volume CXL, Issue 20260, 8 November 1935, Page 9
Word Count
191“WHY SHOULD I NOT NAME HIM?” Timaru Herald, Volume CXL, Issue 20260, 8 November 1935, Page 9
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Timaru Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.