Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AMERICA AND JAPAN.

OCCUPATION OF SAGHALIN. AN UNSATISFACTORY REPLY. By Cable. — Press Association. — Copyriyhi.(A. & N.Z.) WASHINGTON, Aug. IC. It is understood that the Japanese reply to the American Note regarding the occupation of Sakhalin is considered unsatisfactory. It is believed that Japan does not recede from any position she has assumed, and to which the United States has taken exception. Japan claims that Saghalin is virtually a part of the maritime province of Nikolayevsk, and, therefore, subject to the Japanese occupation, due to the Nikolayevsk massacre. It is understood that the reply further points out that the creation of a Siberian "buffer State" is essential in-order to prevent the spread of Bolshevism, and intimates that the occupation of Saghalin depends upon military contingencies.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNCH19200817.2.46

Bibliographic details

Sun (Christchurch), Volume VII, Issue 2030, 17 August 1920, Page 6

Word Count
123

AMERICA AND JAPAN. Sun (Christchurch), Volume VII, Issue 2030, 17 August 1920, Page 6

AMERICA AND JAPAN. Sun (Christchurch), Volume VII, Issue 2030, 17 August 1920, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert