A DIVIDING FENCE.
A QUESTION OF COST. • Before'Mr T. A. B. Bailey, S.M„ in lhc : Magistrate's Court this afternoon, a case was heard under the Fencing Act if or determining the defendant's liability in respect to the reinstatement of a dividing fence at Sumner that plaintiff alleged had been undermined by excavation and drainage on defendant's , side.. The plaintiff was Archibald Scoit and the defendant Eveleen Laura Bradbury, while Matthew HylElam was also joined as defendant. Mr Geo. Harper appeared for the plaintiff, Mr Dougall for the defendant, and Mr Salter for El am. (Proceeding)
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNCH19170313.2.90
Bibliographic details
Sun (Christchurch), Volume IV, Issue 963, 13 March 1917, Page 11
Word Count
95A DIVIDING FENCE. Sun (Christchurch), Volume IV, Issue 963, 13 March 1917, Page 11
Using This Item
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.
Log in