Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

REFUSAL TO DRILL

DIVINITY STUDENTS PUNISHED NO CIVIL RIGHTS Deprived of their civil rights for ten years and ordered to meet penalties of £5 each, A. Miller and Alun M. Richards, Presbyterian divinity students, were severely consured by Mr. F. K. Hunt, S.M., in the Magistrate’s Court yesterday. Both young men, who were charged with failing to attend drill, had refused service on religious grounds. Miller’s case was called first, and Captain J. G. C. Wales, Adjutant of the Ist Battalion, Auckland Regiment, described him as one of those young men who objected to military training through religious scruples. “We have offered him work at the Public Hospital as an equivalent of his military training,” he said. “He could go there in civilian clothes and would in no way be connected with the Defence Department.” According to the captain, Miller’s answer to that had been that he would not accept unless he was first exempted, and that it should be gazetted by Order-in-Council that tlie work was the equivalant of the training. Mr. Hunt, S.M.: That is only

splitting straws. I make you the offer again. Do you accept or not? Miller: I do not. The magistrate was passing sentence when Captain Wales intervened. “The department asks that he be deprived of his civil rights, but that no penalty be imposed,” he urged. “What has the department got to do with it?” asked the magistrate. “It has nothing to do with the action of the court. Here is a boy earning money, and he should pay a fine the same as anyone else.” Richards’s name was then called, and it was mentioned that he had been convicted twice previously and fined £5 on each occasion. His position was the same as Miller’s. The Magistrate: He hopes to teach others, and must himself learn to obey first. Richards also refused the offer which had been made to Miller. John N. McDougaii was also charged with failing to attend drill. “I consider it un-Christian,” he said. He described himself as a Presbyterian. His application for exemption from military training was refused. “Will you go to drill now?” asked the magistrate. McDougaii: No. The clerk of the court reminded the magistrate that when McDougaii had *ast appeared his lather had said that although he did not approve of the ; boy’s action he believed him to be ! sincere. McDougaii was fined £1 and costs. “Prosecute next time if he does not jgo to drill.” advised the magistrate. T wonder how long his father will go on paying ‘fines for him.” —

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19290613.2.147

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 688, 13 June 1929, Page 11

Word Count
426

REFUSAL TO DRILL Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 688, 13 June 1929, Page 11

REFUSAL TO DRILL Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 688, 13 June 1929, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert