Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Cricket.

THE FINAL TEST.

Honours Again to England.

Any doubt which may have existed as to the superiority of the Englishteam has been dispelled by the result of the last Test match. In no way can it be said that luck favoured the visitors. Woodfull again won the toss. After the Australians’ first innings, remarkable for the consistent scoring, the prospects of a close and interesting match appeared good. The Englishmen’s response made it an “ even go.” Australia through Bradman and Woodfull made a good start in the second innings—and then collapsed. Nor on this occasion can it said that Larwood was the destructive agent, for Verity and Allen took the most wickets.

In the Australian batting the colts, O’Brien and Darling, made a good showing in the first innings, and the tail did the best in any match. Oldfield again demonstrated his value as a batsman.

What a great player Larwood must be. His ability as a fast bowler has been proved, and now he appears as a batsman. It was hard luck that he did not get the other two runs to make his century.

Bradman’s innings were brilliant, but the cabled reports leave the impression that the great Australian batsman has become too reckless. The English bowling was not such that a batsman could take too many risks without paying the penalty. One wonders if Bradman had been batting for England whether his scoring would have been bigger. Hammond comes into the light as another century getter. It is rather remarkable how few centuries have been scored in this series of tests. It is something new to read that the Australian fielding was poor. This has usually been the strong feature of the play of Australian teams. That chances were dropped may have to be discounted in importance, for it is never known quite how hard the chance was. Anything which it is possible to catch is regarded as a chance, but it is never said if the fieldsman had accepted it it would have been almost a miracle. McCabe is reported to have missed several catches, and he is regarded as a great slip.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PUP19330302.2.2.4

Bibliographic details

Putaruru Press, Volume XI, Issue 511, 2 March 1933, Page 1

Word Count
358

Cricket. Putaruru Press, Volume XI, Issue 511, 2 March 1933, Page 1

Cricket. Putaruru Press, Volume XI, Issue 511, 2 March 1933, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert