Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A SUDDEN TEMPTATION.

THEFT FROM FRIEND S HOME. CHRISTCHURCH, July 13. The sight of an open cash box in the house of some friends was too great a temptation for Andrew Ivan Christie, and he took a £lO note from it. The crime, however, was quickly discovered, and this morning Christie, who was a railway servant, aged 31, was charged before Mr H. A. Young, S.M., in the Magistrate’s Court •with the theft of a £lO note, the property of Mary Jane Haase. Christie, who was represented by Mr R. Twynehani, elected to be dealt with summarily, and pleaded guilty. Chief Detective Gibson said that Christie was visiting at a private boardinghouse, and was asked by the proprietress to go to her room to get something. While in the room he took a £lO note from the cashbox. He cashed it immediately, and had only £0 on him when arrested, having spent the other £4. Nothing else was known against accused, who was a married man with no family. He had been working for the Railway Department. Mr Twyneliam said that the facts were ns stated by the chief detective. The strange thing was that Christie was a close friend of complainant and her husband. When he went to complainant’s room he saw the cashbox lying open on the bed. A lot of money was exposed, and accused yielded to a sudden temptation. He would be punished severely by losing his position in the Railway Department, and he might also lose his superannuation money. Counsel asked the Magistrate to take these facts into consideration in fixing the penalty, and. in view of the offence being accused’s first fall from grace, he asked for the suppression of his name. Accused was admitted to probation for 12 months on condition that he took out a prohibition order and refunded £4 in such sums as the probation officer directed. The application for the suppression of accused’s name was refused.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OW19260720.2.137

Bibliographic details

Otago Witness, Issue 3775, 20 July 1926, Page 36

Word Count
326

A SUDDEN TEMPTATION. Otago Witness, Issue 3775, 20 July 1926, Page 36

A SUDDEN TEMPTATION. Otago Witness, Issue 3775, 20 July 1926, Page 36

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert