Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

£2OO DEPOSIT.

EXPENSIVE WORKERS’ DWELLINGS. Many workers who some time ago lodged pji application for a house under the Workers’ Dwelling Act received a rude shock when they were informed recently that the deposit required by the Government was £2OO (says the Wellington Post). They i'.ad understood all aiong that the deposit would not exceed £lO, of which amount they had paid-in some cases as long as two years ago—£l on account. The dwellings for which the deposit of £2OO is required are officially known as “Design 25.” The letter from the officcr-in-charge to the applicant reads: “Dear Sir, —A number of dwellings, built to Design 25, are nearing completion at Miramar. Applicants choosing a house ol thi3 design will be required to pay a cash deposit of, approximately, £2OO, in addition to the payment of £IOOO by instalments, anc cost of fencing, approximately £3O, bj instalments under separate agreement. The figures given over and above £IOOO are approximate only, but proposed purchasers should be in a position to pay a. cash deposi up to £2OO. Please let me know by returr mail whether you are prepared to take ovei one of those dwellings under the condition: mentioned.” The matter was referred by a reports: to Mr F. W. Rowley, Secretary of Labour Mr Rowley stated that out of a total of 12( houses which were being- constructed ir Wellington a few were planned on Desigi 25. That, design was more expensive thar any of tbo others, but at the time the} ■were commenced the department thoughl that they could be kept within the statutory limit of £IOOO. Owing, however, to th< increase in the price of cement and othe: materials, and the increase in wages, t hr limit was exceeded. Under the circnm stances the department had no option bui to ask for a deposit which would cove: anything in excess of £IOOO. Had house: been erected for £IOGO or under, the deposi would have been £lO only. “We have already disposed of several houses, the cos: of which exceeded £IOOO, and which calloc for a greater deposit- than £10,” said M: Rowley. “If none of the applicants is ir a position to find the deposit of £2OO non required, we must sell the houses to others Applicants who decline the offer will retail their position of priority.-and will be offeree the cheaper houses as they are completed,”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OW19210118.2.68

Bibliographic details

Otago Witness, Issue 3488, 18 January 1921, Page 20

Word Count
399

£200 DEPOSIT. Otago Witness, Issue 3488, 18 January 1921, Page 20

£200 DEPOSIT. Otago Witness, Issue 3488, 18 January 1921, Page 20

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert