Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

INJURED BY A SCAFFOLD.

EXPENSIVE NEGLIGENCE. CHRISTCHURCH, May 23. This morning, at the Supreme Court, Mr Justice Denniston gave his reserved judgment in the case of Robert Davidson v. Philip Walter Soanes, in which plaintiff claimed damages for injuries sustained through being struck by a falling scaffold pole negligently left standing by the defendant's servant. The case was heard before a jury, after whose verdict an application was made for a new trial. His Honor reviewed the facts of the case, and said that the pole had fallen while the scaffolding was being dismantled, but the case was complicated by_the fact that plaintiff had been employed by defendant in the work. The jury had found that the injury was caused by the personal negligence of the defendant in allowing the corner

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OW19110531.2.2

Bibliographic details

Otago Witness, Issue 2985, 31 May 1911, Page 3

Word Count
131

INJURED BY A SCAFFOLD. Otago Witness, Issue 2985, 31 May 1911, Page 3

INJURED BY A SCAFFOLD. Otago Witness, Issue 2985, 31 May 1911, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert