Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DIVORCE COMMISSION

LONDON, June 1. Lord Alverstone, testifying before the Divorce Commission, objected to giving jurisdiction to county courts or to any inferior court. The difficulty experienced by the poor in getting divorces might be met by the State paying the expenses, as was done in criminal cases. He considered that both husband and wife should have equal grounds for divorce, and that permanent lunacy ought to be a sufficient justification.

The Lord Chief Justice added that the wife should have an equal remedy, but the power and duty to, forgive ought to be more easy to the wife than to the husband.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OW19100608.2.108

Bibliographic details

Otago Witness, Issue 2934, 8 June 1910, Page 26

Word Count
103

DIVORCE COMMISSION Otago Witness, Issue 2934, 8 June 1910, Page 26

DIVORCE COMMISSION Otago Witness, Issue 2934, 8 June 1910, Page 26

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert