Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

“MOST UNJUSTIFIED”

Sir, —In the argument between Mr Holland and Mr Sullivan, reported in your Monday’s issue, occur the following two contradictory statements by which Mr Sullivan hopes to “ clear Mr Holland’s mind” and incidentally convince the intelligent public of the sincerity of his statements:— (1) Every member of Parliament knows that Parliament itself and not the Government has made the decision as tq the course that is being followed, and that the decision was made unanimously by Parliament, without a single dissentient voice. (2) True, there was no division, as he (Mr Holland) contends, but there were many speeches and a declaration by the Prime Minister as to what he understood the will of Parliament to be, and that declaration passed unchallenged. * Could casuistry go further?—l am, etc., Honesty. Dunedin, January 25.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19430127.2.80.2

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 25134, 27 January 1943, Page 4

Word Count
133

“MOST UNJUSTIFIED” Otago Daily Times, Issue 25134, 27 January 1943, Page 4

“MOST UNJUSTIFIED” Otago Daily Times, Issue 25134, 27 January 1943, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert