Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BATHS AND BACTERIA

TO THE EDITOR Sir, —Your correspondent “ Proteus X 19 ” gives us a most disturbing warning of the dangers of public baths. One wonders bow any bather survives this “ teeming multitude of disease-spreading microbes which infest the water.” While agreeing with him that certain preventive measures are necessary for the _ proper control of bath hygiene, I am inclined to think he is grossly exaggerating the dangers. There is most definitely not_ a steady stream of ear, nose and throat infections from any public bath in this country. There is, moreover, no proof that any such infections, if they do occur, arise from, or are transmitted by. the water of swimming baths. It is more than possible that the germs are present on the body of the bather, and that the water merely washes such germs into the nose or ear. In support of ' this is the fact that three cases of ear disease were reported_ to have occurred as a r esult of bathing in the Blue Bath at Rotorua while I was there on holiday this summer. This bath is said locally to prevent the growth _of germs by reason of its chemical constituents. It would seem, therefore, that the “ teeming multitudes ” could not have been responsible in this case. With regard to the somewhat fantastic precautions before bathing suggested by “ Proteus X 19,” I am only surprised that he did not advocate a thorough washdown with a strong animal disinfectant. Besides being quite unnecessary, such an elaborate routine could never be enforced in a public bath. The use of a foot bath and a convenience ensures a perfectly adequate standard of cleanliness. There is at the present time a great deal of nonsense talked about these bacterial dangers, with the result that many keen bathers are being discouraged from enjoying this healthy pursuit, while those who are hardy enough to venture into the baths are subsequently regarded with suspicion and mistrust as potential candidates for some unspeakable disease. It is high time that these vague and, to my mind, unjustified warnings were stopped. Those pioneers of public health who, like “ Proteus X 19,” point to our baths as sources of danger to the community, should be able to substantiate their grim pronouncements more fully before intelligent and experienced bathers can be expected to take them seriously.—l am, etc., March 19. BACKSTROKE.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19360320.2.142.12

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 22835, 20 March 1936, Page 15

Word Count
395

BATHS AND BACTERIA Otago Daily Times, Issue 22835, 20 March 1936, Page 15

BATHS AND BACTERIA Otago Daily Times, Issue 22835, 20 March 1936, Page 15

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert