Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

GROSVENOR STREET, SOUTH DUNEDIN

3 : ' TO TUB EDITOR.

Sir,— Please permit ra6 to suggest to Mr P W. Shackloek that he‘should not insult his neighbours by referring. to fthem disparagingly on account of the effect of environment,” and as being a class of people who are quite satisfied to Uyo in a slum.” I do not know a slum in Grosvenor street. I did not say I was “satisfied and can see no need for alteration” but, when I make an alteration I usually estimate the cost fust, anti study whether the proposal 19 wortli it, and whether the cost (money) could be spent to better 1 advantage in some other " Mr Shackloek sure that the city building regulations will permit ot a reduction of the area of land allowed for each house or that the City Council can guarantee that there/will ‘ not be any increase in rates, or can anyone that the present tenants, will have tho option of the renovated houses at m present rentals, and why? for giving some details of his proposal and his estimate of , the , cost of com- ; pensation. He docs not giveany estimate of other costs of his which he probably, and reasonably, has some difficulty in forming an estimate 01 perhaps he thinks that because it xs_to be paid for by Government, money, tlm cost does not matter. If so, I do not ag £“ ussipS that Mr Shaddock’s proposal .is put into effect and has cost £IO,OOO. What have we got for it.' in. / my opinion we have got ‘ a . nse in t ic standard of living,” but, against that y* have reduced the productive power the residents by reducing the.area of their ground, just at a time when the Goveinment is asking for. more ground, from which people may produce, and, , what m of equal importance, we have reduced their opportunities of enjoyment m thn study and tending of by the cultivation of that ground.' Now, can WP t<£ day afford to spend money in raising the standard of living instead ot the increase ff production? f say. No. Ifthe^oney is spent as suggested it .is finished with so far as its effect on employment is concerned; but if it-were, spent in bringing land into production now it would result in our having more produce, to export, m payment of our commitments overseas, and would be a yearly recurring source of employment in more production, vuipy street and Grosvenor street arci bothi ifi the same position; they are both as laid out when the townships were surveyed, .mt ; altered. — I am, etc., . Owner. , July 0. ' ■ ' ‘ '

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19320712.2.101.11

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 21694, 12 July 1932, Page 9

Word Count
434

GROSVENOR STREET, SOUTH DUNEDIN Otago Daily Times, Issue 21694, 12 July 1932, Page 9

GROSVENOR STREET, SOUTH DUNEDIN Otago Daily Times, Issue 21694, 12 July 1932, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert