MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

Otago Daily Times, Issue 20833, 27 September 1929, Page 13

MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

Thursday, September 26. (Before Mr H! J. Disoni S.M.)

DEFAULT CASES.

.In. the following cases judgment was BSS.VrV' 8 . xiaius, Jjtcl M v. James Fraser plniin r*i Ss, cost of advertirtiug (costs 21 12s (id) * W P f% rOW i aT \ d S 1 V * L - Herbert Beni*Wt (7 cnilJ ka), claim £6, for coods sim-. plied (costs, £1 10s 6d); Electrical "Sales Agency v. R. Turner (Palmerston), claim ri f( S Koods Biipphed . (costs, £1 13s 6d) D. R Hewitson v. A. W. C. Macdonald claim £5 16s Bd, for goods suiY phed (costs, £1 16s Cd);' New Zealand Breweries v. James F'inhevty (Tawanuil claim fi, or return .of a keg (costs. ss);’ J. G. and L. M. Mewhmney v. W,' Anderson cJaim £!5 -7s fed, for rent of premises at North-East A alley (costs, £2 14s)James J, Niven and Co. v. Donald M'Grc’gor claim £7 2s, for goods supplied (costs, £1 10s 6d); 1. D. Jamieson v. T. Andcrson, claim £1 8s 7d, for goods supplied (costs, 10s); H. C. Johnson v. A. Thomas r? 11 ? -*-® s * or l ,oarc l and lodging (costs’ £( 3s); same v. W. J. Jobson. claim £•% tor board and lodging (costs; 8s) ; E. J. Bryant v. WiUiam David Wilson, claim kin-S on a promissory note (costs, 17s): White and .Co. v. William Proven (Wai- ?’ ata * h. ] c 1 all V £or goods sold (costs, f? .’ >s - G A- Hurridge v. David Moore, Od) m 2 ’ r goods s,, PPIi G d ■ (costs, 17s

JUDGMENT SmiMONSES. ■ Trade Auxiliary Company of New Zialanrl v. N. M . Anderson.-claim £4 5s o i, a judgment summons; Mr Lousier ap-peared-tor plaintiff.- Defendant did not appear, and an order was made calling on liim to pay tlie amount, with costs (7si forthwith, in default live days’ imprisonment.

A. -Nicholson v. James Fraser, claim £-» is 3d, on a judgment, summons. Mr Ruffrll appeared for plaintiff. Defendant did no 1 appear, and an order was made for pav--I!YYt-70f(!VY'--imo,"rltt -7 Of (! VY'-- imo ,"r lt f orUnrith - ly ith costs (£1 7s-6d), in default 10 days’ imprisonment.

.J- and A. P. Scott v. James Bennie, claim £ll 12s 6d, on a judgment summons! Mr Baylee appeared for plaintiff. Defcndaut did not appear, and an order was made for payment of the amount, with costa (£2 8s), .in default 14 days’ imprisonment. ‘

W. Harris and Son v. A. D. Smith, claim £4 2s, on a judgment summons. Mr Bavler. appeared for plaintiffs. Defendant 'did' not appear, and an prder was made for payment, with costs (14s), in default four days imprisonment.