MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Otago Daily Times, Issue 15855, 29 August 1913, Page 9

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Thursday, August 28.

(Before Mr H. Y. Widdowson, S.M.)

Judgment was given for plaintiffs in the following undefended cases:—Peter Aitken v. Herbert Spencer Bolt, claim £2, for goods supplied (costs 10s); Dunedin and Suburban Mutual Money Club v. Robert James Waugh, claim £7 8s "6d, for mopey owing (casts £1 4s 6d); .Ca.xton Printing Conipany v. W. J. Mabcr (Rangiora-), claim £3, for advertising (costs ss); Johnston. Sons, and Co. (Mr Scantlebury) v. John Doyle (Wellington), claim £2 17s, for book supplied (costs 10s);'kme v. William Henry Foot (Palmerston North), claim £1 Os 6d, for book supplied (costs ss); same v. Charles Hazeldino (Brunnerton), claim £1 7s, for book supplied (costs ss); same v. Nicholson Ford (Palmeraton North), claim £2 10; (ccsts 10s); same v. Percy Griffin (Palmer'ston North), claim £3 15s (costs 106); same v. J. Donnelly (Martinboroughl, claim £2 2s (costs 10s); same v. William Gordon Barratt (Marton), claim £4 4s (costs 10s); same v. William Henry Harvey, claim £5

5s (ccsts £1 45,6 d); came v. Arthur Reginald Hookway (Palmereton North), claim £1 12s'(costs ss); same v. Frank Walter Millar (Mohaka), claim £1 7s (costs ss); same v. John James M'Cleary (Dannevirkc). claim £2 7s 6d (costs 10s); same v. Jane v -Ttli<:ott (Waitaral. claim £3 15s - (co-ste

14s); same v. William James Wclhan (Eltham), claim £3 15s (costs 10s); same v. Harry ■ Savage (Christrburcl'i).

(costs 10s); same v. FncoM il

(Taumarunui), claim £3 15s (costs 10s); same v. Daniel Mahoney (Wellington), claim £2 17s (costs 10s); same v. Julius Fitzgerald Tocher (Stratford), claim £3 15s (costs 10s); eamo v.'. William JamC6 Salt (Christchurch), claim 19s 6d (costs ss); same v. William Henry Thomson (Stratford), claim £7 17s 6d (costs £1 3s 6d); Louis Jacobs v. Charles Wybrow (Chaslands). claim £1 8s 6d, i for goods supplied (costs ss); same v. Henry Croft (Chaslands), claim £1 8s 6d, for goods supplied (costs ss); same v. FrankFope (Niagara), claim 15s, for goods supplied (costs ss); Dunedin Fibrous Plaster Company v. Henry Herman Vorreth, claim £9 4s Bd, for goods supplied (co«t6 £1 3s 6d); Gordon and Gotch v. George Hamilton (Winton), claim for costs only (10s); H. E. Slhicklock (Ltd.) v. Albert Horatio Martin (Marton),- claim £27, for goods supplied (costs ■£2 14s); J and' J. Arthur v. George Hall (Riverside), claim £8 Bs, for goods supplied (costs £1 3s 6d); Emanuel .Solomons v. P. Sorenson (Auckland), claim £4 9s 9d, on a promissory note (costs 10s); same v. Canham andßaird (Auckland), claim £2 Ss 4d, for goods supplied- (costs l(fe); Edward 0. Nees v, George Mayhew (Cromwell), claim £2, for goods supplied (costs 10s). • Judgment Summons—Alfred G. ■ Terry (Mr W. L. Moore) v. Edwin J. Warren.— Claim 15s 6d, amount of judgment obtained—After hearing evidence as to defendant's means, his Worship refused to make an order.