MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Oamaru Mail, Volume I, Issue 174, 10 November 1876, Page 3

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

TtlH HAY. [Eefota T. VV. E'aKitten, t 4 lc?<x-> K.M.] WANDBRtXI- MOUSE. Robert McDonald, for nil owing a horse lobo at large wituiu the Uuius of the town, was uuociued njiuiwt (>y the Inipßutot ot Nuisances,. a.id uuiiettsdi m tl.e lain ot <iOs. C ttAJRUES. Patvicilc McCusknr was brought up on iu dnuge ot bomg dermic, using obscene indulge, and bmng an habituaA ui'itukaftL C'ousßitbltt itatue gave evidence jw- t.o Cue uijjiuvge used at. the .I'apali.u.io fipovts by iw licensed, \vuiuii was wt a digitsCi&£ nturo. Ei» Worship said he would take the icoud caarg^—that of using obscene hwimya, and tuilict sue,t a uue wonia trvu us a caution ; but should i.e ewine ip» s 'aia, he woulu send tuiu to gaol as »u abitual drunivard, wuiiotit the opiiioit of hlllt). . . T.mf attch then intlictied a tine ot it tui'vti months' tmpriSi>uais,nc. IffIHACU Off TUB RAttWAY REiH tATIOW. Xolui Joyco w;is si-inmioned upon the Iwvo (•' iiirgo.. Accused ilul ivm6 put tu an f|ißai'iuic. r but was repivsoutcd oy proxy. [lu charge was getf.inj int-.t t.ie tra.n rhitu in mocion, and as it was not dented, to small p«n.Uliy ot lib. was mttiaud. tN TttG t-TvEKX. Fivu hoys, ranging t'roiu twelve to sismi, werw charged wiCli bathing in the rook- t'voni which tue tanks whieU supplied ho town we.ru tillud. laspectoc StC'Clitskuy said he merely up the eharye to act r.s a warning luUiid not wish tu press tor a tine. The Bench was ot opinion that a cer* sin amount of hardship was entailed upon huliuU by having no legitimate place tor swim; but the byt-iaw was sfringwnc l[K)ii thtj point, and it could not be llowod. The c.iarge, however, would be isiuiased, on the understandiu j that t.ie tfuncu should noC bo i:ouunUt^d. CIVIL CASES. Thusu was a perfect host of summons Hubs, the following being among the lumber : Anderson v. Oowtey ; claim for 18s. liumlson v. Myers ; claim for JL'J 3d. Spenca and Bee v. Johnson ; ctunt for £2O lis. Luing v. Clydesdale ; claim for £-& a. Id. M'Jfab and Aimer v. Thompson ; claim «i" .t!W Ts. t'»d. Fallon v. Utegg ; claim for £- t Ts.. iOd. To"hoy v. t'hillips; claiuv for £!♦* IkGd. Wiilson and another v. Thompson; Win fov £ t.> Ss. Bi.l.