Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE EDENDALE ROAD.

Further light has been thrown on the controversy in Mount Albert over the surfacing of Edendale Road, consequent on tho tramway extension. From the case made by the Ratepayers' Association, its proposition to the council is not unreasonable in terms. If accepted, it would have meant that finance for the bitumenised roadway would in all probability have been assured, while the question of an extra commitment for concrete would be left to the decision of the ratepayers. The association specifically undertakes to be bound absolutely by the result of the vote. The council, however, on last night's decision, stands committed to bitumen or nothing. It may'' feel that there must be a limit to, interference with the control of works and finance by an outside body; but it might remember that those who are urging the alternative scheme comprise some, if not necessarily all, the citizens to whom they owe responsibility in the ultimate. In the circumstances it is difficult to see why the ratepayers should not be given the chance to. express an opinion. At present the choice threatens to be between bitumen or nothing, with the addendum of no tramcars. There is no essential principle forbidding the council to allow a popular choice between bitumen and concrete. At the same time, if there is any force in the reported threats to vote against any loan if the council will not consider an additional poll, the Ratepayers' Association should -weigh the position very carefully' before taking so extreme a step. They have made a reasonable case for their request, but such threats go far to spoil it. It seems the obvious way to vote no confidence in the council's policy, but with priority in tramway extension at stake, is it worth the risk? That is the domi-' natiDg consideration which . should be, kept most carefully in mind by both parties to the controversy.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19231019.2.24

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18534, 19 October 1923, Page 6

Word Count
317

THE EDENDALE ROAD. New Zealand Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18534, 19 October 1923, Page 6

THE EDENDALE ROAD. New Zealand Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18534, 19 October 1923, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert