Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WINE MERCHANT FAILS.

I HEAVY LOSS DISCLOSED. ! COURSE OF THE; BUSINESS/ EXAMINATION OF BANKRUPT A Meeting of creditors in the bankrupt i estate of John" George Rutherford {Mr. ! Finlay), 'wine and spirit merchant, of Auckland, was held yesterday afternoon, the official assignee, Mr. WS. Fisher : [presiding. Some 30 creditors were present or represented. Mr. tfaxd represented the National Bank. ■ . Mr Fisher said: that since ; meeting.. '• held on ; October 3 bankrupt's license had been sold to the highest of three tenderers for £325. In addition, the bulk of bankrupt's stock, seizod under- a bill of sale,-t; ;f had been sold by auction, for £134. There ■ were, said the assignee, 161 creditors. Bankrupt's schedule arid stetement~-a summary of which was published in Wed- • nesday'sHEßALD—showed total i; debts at ' £11,051, which £8392 is five to. unsecured - creditors -Assets; ; we?e , shown -," ' • at £1776, leaving a deficiency of , £9275. Bankrupt attributed his; position partly to; the . action of the National Bank;; mv;,/ restricting his operations by \ refusing to .. , honour certain-cheques and in finally ad- \ vertising certain of his goods under a, writ V .' of sale. He suggested" that if allowed to ' continue the business i with proper t; backing he could show a, net profit; of £2500 by"the end of March. Ho would aUept: ::; living expenses in the meanwhile, v ;'• - Figures for Three Years': Trading. .• \. Mr. Fisher read from three balance-* -r 'tweets put in by" bankrupt; for the years ended March 1921, 1922 arid 1923, the gross profits being shown at £10,165. * • £4569 and £5042 - respectively. Other . ,-. details for the same years weYei:—• , - head expenses, £6690,• £6210, £5393 ;■■.". drawings, £344, £919, ' ■:£197;-: capital, £6351, w £5658, 'deficit'of £234; travelling '■? expenses, £1197, £892, £562; salaries, >:; etc., £1950, £1667, £1455; interest paid, £145, £520, £636; general expenses, £559, £630, £291 stock held, £3834. £8200, ;'i;' £7300; amounts due to the bank'. £1857, ; - £2547,; £5523 ■■ -v./ .-'.'...,.'. , Mr. • Fisher said the figures showed - bankrupt's position at the end of the : V ; ;i- .: ; three periods >to -.-'. be -as follows First '; : period, .profit £S?;)i8; second ; period, ulosa / v £2189; third year, apparent loss £1356. ' The ; actail loss in the last year, said the : '"' ■ assignee,, was, £2356, because bankrupt! had inert ised'{'*•«* value.of his goodwill by. £1000. /--,- He would probably be able to v■' explain why. '' / : . •■ \ ' ■ iv' veply to -ciestiojjs, bankrupt said ho iijhad bf.i,i in iiquor trade for 17 or 18 " ■: years. Ju?.t p.'ior to starting his business - he had: been travelling- for:'a-/wine and ! - : '.' spirit mercharir;,: He ; then -had £750 ' " capital, as did his partner, Neither, had ' any liabilities, His; partner looked after-' f the cellar work •'. and bankrupt travelled * for the firm. /There was no deed 'of part- ■ nership drawn up, land his partner left +■ after about two yew': The business ,had been very prosper;- indeed, ; ; Bankrupt bought : it;, from ,k.„ retiring; parte ar * for ';. .'■'■: £2000 0Qv;; : -i. ii.is sum was advanced -by ■■:-■ a manias a private loan. . The .amount r did not go throuffh bankrupt's books be- . cause the lender did not demand security.'' Debt of £2000 Not in Balance-sheets. The Assignee: When did you start to' show that liability i:. your, books? ' Bankrupt: About April, ■ 1922. ' • Why did you show ;: it then Because ■ security had to be given. ■ Did this account for , the reduction of your capital from £3658 ; in? 1921-22 ;to a deficit of £234 in: 1922-23?— Not alto- ' gether. , The year's trading showed" a ' los? ' . ~.'. .-What was your, reason for increasing the value of your goodwill ■ bv £1000 after ! a bad trading The licensinc »,oil being over, I considered the value to" be increased; to that extent; "> . f: Asked why ''he. had not curtailed ex- ' | penses when his accouafs began to show .> - • a reduction, bankrupt said it was '. because; i.he .could v;get; no satisfaction from the , j. bank. ...■/--His increased drawings in the period ended March, 1022, were accounted • \ lor by extra expenses for,; sickness, operations, etc. Furthermore, a sum of £400 .had, been expended-in paying off an overI draft on his/ private account. The busi- ' • j ness could not have been run cheaper than ,it had been run. ; When he saw the : re- ' : | suit of/the year's- in March, ig22 ' ' f 1 and, again in 1923, he; did not: consider his position. a bad one, or that he ought to put his house in order." - - J.-; Mr, Fisher: Did the tank at"any time ' indicate that it would let /you-trade in- - definitely ,on its money?.. ',' ~"'■ Bankrupt: The bank never' laid down' a ..definite; policy. ,-.>•- ;. Played the Game with the Bank. " Then what led you to assume that you " i could gq on trading indefinitely with the : >

bank's money? t : i; Because I had access to bond warrants which I could convert at auy time. ' - And because you had 'those bond ; warrants ; you thought the; bank - should '' have ''■ gone on advancing you capital with -which v ' to / trade ; — Yes, as long; 'as-' . it'. had' >"'•'' r security. > • r v Do you think your t«Hmcnt'.of the bank hs always been satisfactory '?—Yes I have always " the game" by the ■■ bank. J Is it not a felt that you obtained from ■'':■ the .bank a;, number of ■• biid warrants ; " ; ' under a '< solemn promise that, when you ' "/// , sold the subject? of the bond warrants you would -pay-; the money : ; received into : /- ; I the bank Yes. - j And did yon pay in the money far ' " ":'■ as I could. ; The bank'- kept « oollarine" ' r my money. -~ . ~.; h , It was T the bank's money.—No, say mjncy. (Laughter). . J > ' T .., i'ou do not seem .to know the ; diff»r- '■'• euco between rneum and I: tTium.—'Kiahfc ■■■'■' you. •««•*». / Have you.been selling at cutting rates? ~ .;... Mr. *inlay (ror bankrupt) V The licensed victuallers say that. He had' been making about 86 per cent, profit and they thought that was no ! good.- ! A Creditors If he made 86 per cent, ' profit, where has if gone?.' ■"■.•.'./.-.- : J Mr.-. Finlay. There "were'special reasons' ■ why he went back in the last two years, but, i ; before that he was: making a profit - - of 86 per cent. " »,,-> ;•■,•/ .'- ■. . ■'-' ! Bankrupt was closely cross-examined as to various business transactions. He v •denied that he was insolvent last March,and said he thought: he could make the, business show a profit now, with proper. : trading facilities. ; ; ■ 1% '~.*-. ~'"'• ! Mr. Ward put in a statement showing:: |' that, bankrupt's overdraft at. the bank at l : various dates stood at the following figures:—March, ; 1921, £1840; September,- >■-■- ' 1921, £1997; March, 1922, £2525; Septem-'■".' ber, 1922, £4825; March, 1923, £6057.. -■■ . * Comment by tie .Assignee. i. ' '; Commenting upon the -case,, the assignee', ■■■■'.' remarked that, there .were some very ~ sinister aspects. One 'was the -bankrupt's inflation- of the goodwill after the. business had made a very heavy loss. Then ■'" ; there was the matter of the liability of : '".' £2090. on, the private loan riot having been shown on the balance sheets which were, ! presented to the bank from which bankI r«pt was getting accommodation. Another ' matter was that bankrupt : claimed to be a business man, yet, when ;he had -. reached a point of absolute 'insolvency, it had never occurred to him as being the only proper, course, to pursue to•■ consult his creditors. Instead he had gone en and got deeper into ; the": mire. ■Also it ' was at this period when, as an intelligent business .man .he., must have . bead aware -' that he had reached.an extremely'critical ' position that-bankrupt'had -opened an account with a firm and \ obtained, ; goods on credit on which £500 was still owing. motion that the facts be placed -be- - r ' fore the j Crown .Solicitor with- a view to prosecution was'' moved, but found; no >■: seconder. ,-;' ,* %i behalf of /bankrupt Mr, Finhiy/said ■ .'■ ■ ■ there was a small; prospect of .Rutherford' ■ , "getting on' to' his feet again. -In that ; case he would pay what he. could to his creditors. ', • . ■ _ A resolution asking the assignee to have an investigation made of. bankrupt's ac- . counts from March last to She date? of hits: . bankruptcy was carried. ■ -/ : -:X/;;/.'-/

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19231019.2.21

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18534, 19 October 1923, Page 5

Word Count
1,307

WINE MERCHANT FAILS. New Zealand Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18534, 19 October 1923, Page 5

WINE MERCHANT FAILS. New Zealand Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18534, 19 October 1923, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert