Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PARLIAMENT.

PUBLIC TRUST BILL.

DISCUSSED IN COMMIT

TRUSTEE'S LIABILITY

INDEMNIFYING CLAU!

SOME ADVERSE COMMENT

[BY TELEGBATH. VBXSS ASSOCIATION.]

'.' Wellington, Tuesday. -,;V/; : Th=: House of Representatives met at 2.30 flfS p.m. The Irrigation Water Supply Bill was introduced by Governor's Message. la .:;YsjS reply to Mr. G. W. Russell (Avon), the .J',; Prime Minister (the Hon. W. F. Massey);jl|| said the Bill proposed to appropriate a ;|*| sum of not mom than .15100,000 for opening up lands for settlement lin .rid territories, '-"i principally in Central - Otago. In reply to Wa further inquiries, the Hot;. James Allen 11 said that for some years pact the amount '-'}, allocated for this purpose had, been put into the Appropriation Bill, but the Go- "Jm vernment thought it better to show '|i exactly what was being done 'with the ;y"| money, and so it was being ; put into ay; separate Bill. .. ... - • -«j The House then went into committee on the Public Trust Office Amendment Bill. During the discussion on the thort 1 title, 1 the Hon. A. L. Herdman, in reply to Mr. ~', Russell, declined to disclose" th*, evidence' *"-.; taken by the recent-, Public Trust Office "- ; Commission, that evidence having been' -. given under a distinct promise-: that it ,";?:' would be treated as confidentiaL At all later stage, Mr. Russell elicited the. fact .', : that the Minister had seen the evidence, '.v, whereupon he declared the position -was- I ' ; most unfair to those who had given evi- I dence, under the pledge of secrecy, that "\-V their statements should be handed to the --) Minister, and possibly be made subject to '|| , review by the Cabinet. He contrasted Una- -,| position with that taken up by the Public ';] r Service Commission tinder the Mackenzie Go- IS vernment which did not baud to the Go- ;-}M vernment the evidence given under the bond, v.V;: of confidence. Ho contended that as a member of Parliament he had as much right to see confidential evidence «<$ the Minister bad. The short title was'then passed, and in Clause 3 the personnel of the board ! ■was, on the motion of the Minister, amended, so. as to ; include the .Minister *| ' for finance. The proposal 'to include" two non-official - members on the l»oard, excited considerable criticism, and Mr. R. McCallum (Wairau)'.\,?W moved to so amend the clause as to ensure |&:£ ; the appointees coming'- from the ■ Public Service, The amendment was lost on■ the':-;':V-voices. v ' ' W' . ■ Retrospective Clause Disputed. ' "vWhen the House resumed, the consideration of the Bill in the evening, Mr. Mo- ' Galium moved .to strike out Clause ; : 25, indemnifying: the Public Trustee in cases -f'p ; •where he accepted, in error, hut in good faith, any written-statement or statutory : . .>-< declaration as to a birth, death, marriage, -H'';;* or other matter of descent or relationship,' .-'js or other matter of fact .upon, which, the ' ' _. title to any estate or any part thereof may,' -./.-: depend. The section to be '» retrospective j f:'i% to the passing of, the principal Act. He 1 contended that this protection should not be given to the Public Trustee unless the '•. :.v£ Minister . was. prepared to; protect •. private- .| trustees in ■ the same way.'. He claimed ' 1 that the House should not pass retrospec- .:'.■:■}.', tive legislation, of this kind without know- , ing more about it. ; The Minister explained thai the: clause. .-'.-. was copied from the English Act, ; ami was;: working well ,there.;..;. Cases ;had, ; occurred in 'the history of '. the office where ,on the •:'-:?; strength of statutory declarations the wrong persons had been .paid, and it was : necessary to protect'the Public Trustee in, .' ■<, cases of that kind. The Hon. D. Buddo (Kaiapoi) said;;theM clause would undermine public confidence, ; , in the office. The Public Trustee should : j protect himself in the same way as a private trustee did —by indemnity. . Mr. Russell "protested against, the passing of retrospective legislation.'i Mr. E. A. Lee (Oamaru) contended I :thaVSSsag the clause was not framed to protect'the " Public Trustee, but to protect the Public ;, Trust Fund from: liability. .• v v; : •■','vV : '■? IW (Mr. McCallum ■. contended > that the clause« : "§m in the Imperial statute was not applied 'mmc||3 the same way as it was 1 introduced into thisVßill. '• There; it applied only to : the r- £ S\: custodian trustee; and not to the'admiwatrative trustee. '■-. " . ,; Mr. Herdman,contended that the clause p was necessary to the efficient working of ■;-:';.' 51' the office. There were cases pending at ;, '■) the present time into -which' the element of doubt entered, and this clause would : -. enable the' trustee to settle, these cases more expeditiously than would otherwise be the case. ' '•;" ■- ..;;;'. .; ', Limiting Operation to Small Estates. t'+~< ■:■:.■■■ Mr. W. A. Veiteh (Wanganui) suggested, limiting the operation of the; clause to the" y smaller estates. The Minister said .he-was '. -V prepared to make the clause operative only in estates not exceeding £500 in value. He . was also prepared to strike out the retro- V-v..C spective part of the clause. . _ ', The Opposition was scarcely mollified by ;• these , concessions, their contention , being that the smaller estates, were tho vary ones that ought to bo exempt' from the opera- - tion of the clause, that discrimination be- (,\»;f' tween the large and snail estates would bo ■•;:>;; fatal to the business of the office, and thai if one class of estates were exempt then ■ all ! . '.s' should be exempt. A • division was : then taken .on the■ ques-,." r ;.; tion of amending .the "clause in, the direc- ' _ tion suggested' by the Minister, Tho voting being ayes 41, noes 19, the clause was " -' amended. . \ Mr. Russell then moved an amendment - .; to provide that the clause shall not ab- , solve the Public-Trustee from any'liability ; which he would be required to discharge if :Zo?f he-were a private trustee. -On a division : --- the amendment was lost by 44 to 16. •-*. ' :;!; :, The Bill was reported with amendments. The committee considered the Pensions ij; Bill, which .gassed through with machinery amendments. | The House rose at 12.50 a.m. ; .'■ . ■ ■ ■, - ■-'- '■■~.-'.-■ -: : '' '■■■'•■■.-' .■ .-.'■•--..■.;■-;'■'■ .--■ •-■'r-T. ; :'"-"■.■■.,'-■ .-...'::-.- T'l^'*.,:

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19130827.2.110

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume L, Issue 15390, 27 August 1913, Page 10

Word Count
975

PARLIAMENT. New Zealand Herald, Volume L, Issue 15390, 27 August 1913, Page 10

PARLIAMENT. New Zealand Herald, Volume L, Issue 15390, 27 August 1913, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert