Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

INJURED IN A THEATRE.

A FALL DOWN STEPS,

CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FAILS.

[by telegraph.— press association.']

Wellington, Friday. A recent incident at His Majesty's Theatre, Courtenay Place, was investigated in the Supreme Court to-day. The case wag heard by His Honor the Chief Justice (Sir Robert Stout) and a jury of four. Mrs. Elizabeth Walsh attended the theatre one evening, and fell over in walking to a seat, and she claimed £114 10s as damages. The proprietors! Messrs. Fuller and Sons, said that the lady did not look where she was going. >• The plaintiff, a widow and boarding-house-keeper, said that owing to the defendants failing to sufficiently light their theatre she suffered injury. Certain steps in the passage from the door of the gallery to the side were dangerous and unsafe. On the evening of February 3 last she was passing along the passage to occupy a seat at the side of the gallery, and did not see tho steps. She fell down. and became permanently disabled. She had been prevented for six weeks from attending to her occupation, and had incurred medical expenses. The steps were unguarded, and the firm's servant invited her to walk along the passage. The small bone in her left arm was broken, and her left shoulder was dislocated. She was still unable to raise her arm above the shoulder.

The negligence was denied by the defendants, and they also denied that the theatre was not sufficiently lighted, or that the steps were rendered dangerous and unsafe. They denied that the plaintiff could not and did not see the steps. They were constantly used, and plainly visible. The plaintiff did not look where she was going, and did not exercise ordinary care. Other persons went there without injury.'' After hearing evidence the jury returned a verdict for the defendants without retiring.

The defendants' counsel then stated that Messrs. Fuller and Sons had always sympathised with the plaintiff, and had offered to pay her expenses.

His Honor: That is a very generous ofTer. It is perfectly plain to me that even without light it is a person's duty to look out for steps.

Costs on the lowest scale were allowed.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19110527.2.37

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XLVIII, Issue 14691, 27 May 1911, Page 7

Word Count
364

INJURED IN A THEATRE. New Zealand Herald, Volume XLVIII, Issue 14691, 27 May 1911, Page 7

INJURED IN A THEATRE. New Zealand Herald, Volume XLVIII, Issue 14691, 27 May 1911, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert