VOID INSURANCE POLICY.
BUILDING WRONGLY DESCRIBED.
[BY TELEGRAPH. —PRESS ASSOCIATION'.]
, ■ Dunedin, Wednesday. I The judgment of ! Miv Justice Williams was read this morning in an important insurance case, Samson v. the Atlas Insurance Company, involving the position of a policy-holder who signed a blank form, allowing his agent to fill in particulars, ono of which particulars materially misdescribed; the "building, which ; was destroyed .by fire in June., All through the premises woro charged at the rale of [ a plastered ' building, instead of tmplastered,' which it was. The case showed that neither; Samson' nor his agent were aware that; the building was misdoscribed. His Honor found that since the'facts did not- show the clerk who filled the proposal in to bo an agent for the company for the purpose of negotiating insurance, but only Samson's agent, if the statements were untrue in any j material particular the signatory must take the consequences. He, therefore, held that the policy was rendered void by misrepresentation.;. 1 ; '■.';■■;,;. ■-.'• .'^:'>' : *,
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19091028.2.42
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume XLVI, Issue 14203, 28 October 1909, Page 5
Word Count
163VOID INSURANCE POLICY. New Zealand Herald, Volume XLVI, Issue 14203, 28 October 1909, Page 5
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.