COURT OF APPEAL.
[by TELEGRAPH. —PRESS ASSOCIATION.] Wellington Thursday. The Appeal Court is enga&d with the Nelson case of Moore v. Oiford. The parties are medical practitioner, und appellant sold his practice at RMimond in 1905 to respondent, agreeing thattie would not practise within eight miles Richmond. In 1907 appellant went ify> partnership with two other medical petitioners in Nelson, which was within-eight miles of Richmond, and practiced Nelson ■ for three months Respondent- Orford, brought an action to recover liquated damages under appellant's bond, \nd Mr. Justice Cooper entered up judgment for £300. This is an appeal from tilt decision, and the Appeal Court has xl served judgment. ■ v .\
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19080508.2.31
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume XLV, Issue 13744, 8 May 1908, Page 5
Word Count
109COURT OF APPEAL. New Zealand Herald, Volume XLV, Issue 13744, 8 May 1908, Page 5
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.
Log in