Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WHANGAREI ITEMS.

[by TEi.Eur.Arir. —OWN" rORRKSrONtfKS'.T.] . Wuaxcarki, Tuesday. At the S.M. Court to-day a number of undefended cases were dealt with, the first defended case coining before the Bench being that of Fagan Bros., Miller and Co. v. Palmer. Plaintiffs and defendant in this case are flaxniillcrs, of Ruarangi. Mr. Killen appeared for the plaintiffs, and Mr M ■Steadman for the defendant. The two firms had both purchased the flax on the same piece of land at Waikiekie, the plaintiffs from the Waikiekie Road Board, and the defendant from Mrs. Babe, within whose fence the said land was, but which was proved to be an old road reserve. Tho defendant cut the flax off the land,-and the plaintiffs therefore sued for loss of profit on the flax taken. In evidence the plaintiffs stated that, they paid 4> royalty for,, the flax per ton. It. cost 6s cutting and 10s per ton cartage to the mill, £16 to £18 per ton to dress, 10s per ton dressed fibre cartage to wharf, and 12s bd per ton freight to Auckland, cartage from wharf 24 'bd. It' took 8i to 9 tons of green flax at 20s at mill to make a ton of dressed fibre. There was £7 10s to £8 per ton profit on every ton of fibro they had dressed. Judgment was given for the plaintiffs for £10 !?.-> claimed, and Court costs £2 2.-, witness' expenses £3 s u . solicitors' fees £1 6>. The only other defended case was Bell v. Swaffieid. claim for £35 for pigs sold to defendant by plaintiff. Plaintiff held that the value of the pigs was only £26. which he paid into Comt, together with £1 3?i cost*. Judgment v. as given Icr the balance of the amount sun! for, together with the extra. Court- cost 1 -, and £3 6* and solicitor'.- fee £2 2s. the 8.-uch entisidering that plaintiff had proved that defendant hud purchased the pig* as delivered to him. air. Dyer disposed of the whole of the work before live o'clock. The Whangarei District Licensing Bene!) Fat to-day. Mr. Dyer, S.M., occupied the chair. The following license were granted, subject to the following license fees:—-Com-mercial, Settler-.' mid Whangarei Hotels, V/hangarci, and Knr.3 Spring* Hotel, £+ each, tea o'clock licenses; I'oioti, £10: Hikurangi, £20; Maunguiuroto, little Omaha, and Mangawai, £10; Kamo. £io, subject to the license being transferred to new tenant within three months; Ngniiguru and Parua Hay, reduced from £10 to £5. Packet license' for Puckm, £5. Ivanieri and Ngapuhi, £10 each, were also granted: also a wholesale license to William Woods o! Whangarei.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19050614.2.8

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XLII, Issue 12892, 14 June 1905, Page 3

Word Count
431

WHANGAREI ITEMS. New Zealand Herald, Volume XLII, Issue 12892, 14 June 1905, Page 3

WHANGAREI ITEMS. New Zealand Herald, Volume XLII, Issue 12892, 14 June 1905, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert