Winn Mr. Dalziel mentioned in the Wellington Supreme Court, (says the Post of Wednesday last) that the reason why the case of Lambert v. Rod had first been adjourned, was because there was some objection by the other tide to the action being heard by tL > local judges, Mr. Justice Denniston promptly remarked that he hoped never to hear a statement in Court that any client or any solicitor objected to a particular judge trying any case. The matter was being further explained by both counsel when His Honor said it iw'a new thing to him that any solicitor had the right to object to any judge. He was sorry that a statement of the kind should have been made, and he would not sit in Court to hear it. The subject was riot again referred to.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19020424.2.76.3
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXIX, Issue 11948, 24 April 1902, Page 5
Word Count
137Page 5 Advertisements Column 3 New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXIX, Issue 11948, 24 April 1902, Page 5
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.