Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE PROPOSED MEETING AT THE FIREBELL.

TO THE KDITOK. Sir, — think in justice to myself that some accurate explanation with regard to the meet-in-o- falling through should be given, ana not Mr. R. K. Hunt's account, for, seeing that I only returned from a month's sojourn in the bush last Saturday, and both meetings at the Y.M.C.A. Rooms and the firebeil had been convened in my absence I do not see why I should be -made tho scapegoat in the matter on a plea, especially, of a paltry jealousy against another political organisation Air. Hunt is well aware that my true reason for refusing to take part was because I would not be m?de a 14 cat spa w ' by himseii and party, and tins I told him canduhy, but he does not choose to make my position clear 0:1 this point. The facts, shortly, are those: Some six weeks since Mr. Hunt a-sKeci me"if I could get speakers from the _ Trades and Labour Council and other organisations for a public meeting re railway matters. I pointed out to him that his actions m the past had not pleased the Trades and Labour Council and others, and suggested t.iat the question of land settlement and the ban Francisco re-vice should be added to the programme, and wa- very emphatic that the '.nccting should 00 of citizens, with 110 p litical colour about it. To my surprise, curing my absence, and under misrepresentation. mv nam 3 was made us© of for political motives", and since that lime again, and before my return, another meeting was called without the knowledge and consent of the I executive, in such a manner as to make it appear that certain party organisations were going to slate tho Government over the appropriations for public works North of Auckland. I strongly resented this action, a:;d refused to take part personally at the proposed firebeil meeting, hut my solitary action did not stop that meeting. I give place to no one in my desire to see justice done to the Xort'u of Auckland. Personally, I consider that the district has been scandalously treated by all past Governments, ever since tho initiation of the public works policy in 1370. When we see a Government supporter obtain the promise of £15,000 on the Estimates for a small extension of line, which could well stand or?r until the Main Trunk line was completed, and only a like amount for the construction works of all the rest of the Auckland-Mangonui line, I think the cause of this is not far to reek. In the face of this last effort I think Mr. Hunt should leave the question of getting up a pubi-c meeting to someone else.— am. etc., ; T. E. Cheat,.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19011031.2.61.1

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 11799, 31 October 1901, Page 6

Word Count
459

THE PROPOSED MEETING AT THE FIREBELL. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 11799, 31 October 1901, Page 6

THE PROPOSED MEETING AT THE FIREBELL. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 11799, 31 October 1901, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert