RAILWAY ARBITRATION CASE.
[by telegraph.—press association.]
Wellington, Saturday. In the Midland Railway arbitration case to» day Mr. Gully applied for further particulars as to the Company's claim in respect of mining reserves, clause 33 of the contract (dealing with application for land) timbor claims, and generally as to various matters claimed. For the Company, it was contended that further particulars as to clause 33 wero handed in yesterday, and this was admitted. Tho Company then agreed to give as many particulars as possible regarding mining reserves on Monday. Mr. Gully announced that the Government was willing to accept Mr. Blake's suggestion, and treat the notice of appointment of arbitration given by the Company to the Crown as giving notice of other matters mentioned in tho second statement of claim in addition to the seizure of the line. (Tho effect of this will now bring within tho scope of arbitration all objections held by the Company since the seizure of the line on tho 14th January, 1895.)
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH18951202.2.32
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXII, Issue 9992, 2 December 1895, Page 5
Word Count
166RAILWAY ARBITRATION CASE. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXII, Issue 9992, 2 December 1895, Page 5
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.
Log in