Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

VALIDITY OF VOTE

Voting is done by putting a cross against the name of the candidate or candidates preferred by the elector, and not in the-man-ner followed at the Parliamentary elections. However, the main rule is that provided a .returning officer can clearly see the wish of the voter then the vote still counts.

Should a person through oversight or nervousness spoil a ballotpaper or find that he has so marked it that it will not convey his wish, then all he has to do is to cross out all the names and then hand the spoiled paper to the deputy returning officer. A fresh paper will then be issued. This provision of the rules covering local body elections is not generally known, and there is no need simply because a mistake has been made inadvertently, for a person to forgo his right to vote as he wishes.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NA19440523.2.89.16

Bibliographic details

Northern Advocate, 23 May 1944, Page 7

Word Count
148

VALIDITY OF VOTE Northern Advocate, 23 May 1944, Page 7

VALIDITY OF VOTE Northern Advocate, 23 May 1944, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert