Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Validity Contested In Supreme Court

COMPANY MAKING CLAIM Per Press Association. AUCKLAND, Last Night. An action in the {Supreme Court challenging the validity of the Import Control Regulations, 1938, was commenced before Mr. Justice Callan. The jjlaintiff, F. E. Jackson, and Company, Limited, of Auckland, set forth that in February last they imported from Sydney 24 dozen tin plate kerosene pumps, complied with all the provisions of the Customs Act, paid duty and demanded delivery of the package, which delivery was refused on the ground that the importation of the said tinware was prohibited unless covered by a license from the Minister of Customs. Plaintiff claimed that the regulation of prohibition was invalid and that the Collector of Customs had wrongfully detained the package. They claimed delivery or cost of goods plus £IOO damages for the detention. Mr. A. H. Johnstone, ICC., with Mr. Munro, argued the case for plaintiff and the Solicitor-General, Mr. H. 11. Cornish, with Mr. V. R. Meredith, appeared for defendant, the Collector of Customs, Auckland.

Mr. Johnstone said the facts were simple. Plaintiff company imported goods as stated from Sydney and requested delivery of them but was told the goods would not be delivered unless plaintiff produced a license under the Import Control Regulations, 1938, authorising him to do so. Those regulations were made on December 5, 1938, and came into force two days later. Plaintiff submitted that these regulations were without validity of law, were ultra vires and void and persisted in his demaud for the delivery of the goods. The question for determination appeared to be whether the Import Control Regulations, 1938, were valid regulations or not. Legal argument occupied the whole day, the hearing being unfinished.

three Auckland factories on Monday. He was accompanied by members of his Party and representatives of the Auckland Manufacturers' Association. Mr. Savage received enthusiastic receptions everywhere. -

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MT19390426.2.67

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Times, Volume 64, Issue 96, 26 April 1939, Page 6

Word Count
310

Validity Contested In Supreme Court Manawatu Times, Volume 64, Issue 96, 26 April 1939, Page 6

Validity Contested In Supreme Court Manawatu Times, Volume 64, Issue 96, 26 April 1939, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert