MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

Manawatu Times, Volume XLVIII, Issue 3598, 2 April 1924, Page 7

MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

CIVIL BUSINESS, Mr J. L .Stout, S.M., presided at a sitting of the Magistrate’s Court yesterday. JUDGMENTS BY DEFAULT. Judgment for plaintiff by default was entered in each of the following cases;—Kairanga Auctioneering Co., Ltd., (Mr Innes) v. F. J. V. Wilson, claim £6O 0 S 6d, costs £7 7/-; E. C. Barnett (Mr Oram) v.. A. McArthur, £6 6/ costs £1 11/6; J. A. Pederson (Mr Oakley) v. R. J. Thompson, £ls 18/-, costs £3 .11/: Dahl and Son (Mr Abraham) v. V. J. Harrison, £2 •&/, costs £1 3/6; New Zealand Jersey Breeders’ Association (Mr Innes) v. H. H. Dorr, £3 3/-, costs £1 5/6; same v. J. C. Monteflere, £3 3/-. costs £1 3/6; A. E. Ekstcdt (Mr Plutchison) v. H. E. Whitford. £l2 2/11, costs £2 15/; Hamilton Sinclair (Mr Fletcher) v. C. Flyger, £l, costs £1 16/; Garner and Garner (Mr. Fletcher) v. F. O. Johansen, £l7 Os 9d, costs £2 19/. JUDGMENT SUMMONSES,

D. G. Monrad was ordered to pay Glodfinch and Cousins £9 10/6, in default seven days’ ‘ Imprisonment. Miss O. P. Kay scouted an order against T. H. Foster for Ike payment of £1.2 13/11 in default seven days’ invpr.fcr ment, warrant t; he suspended so lon gas defendant paid £1 per month.

H. James was ordered to pay Leslie S. Poison (Mr Cooper) £9 15/3, in default 14 days’ imprisonment, warrant to be' suspended so long as defendant paid fl per month. An order was made against B. G. Polngdcstre for the payment to the WhakarOnga Dairy Co., (Mr Abraham)) of £2 17/4, in default seven days. Charles Cooksley was ordered to pay M. E. and 25. J. Nash (Mr Marton) the sum of £9 1/ with 14 days’ imprisonment as an alternative. Ct AIM FOR REPAIRS. George Mills, motor mechanic, proceeded against Wiliam Young, porter, clairanig the sum of £ll- 10/ for repairing and painting a motor-car, which work it was alleged plaintiff had carried out for defendant in June, 1923. Mr Cooper appeared for plaintiff and Mr Oram for defendant. For tho defence, Mr Oram stated that an agreement to have the work done was admitted, but when the car was taken out on a trial run after its supposed overhaul, trouble was experienced, and judging by the condition of the engine and works, the work had been carried out in by no means a proper manner. After hearing lengthy evidence, Mr Stout gave judgment in favour of defendant, with costs, £4 2/.