Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TAX ON DAIRY PRODUCE.

GORE DAIRYMEN’S PROTEST. ‘About 2,5 dairy-farmers met in La--1 chain's rooms on Saturday afternoon o consider tlie propos.d lax on dairy produce. Mr D. McDougall (convener of the meeting), who presided, isa.id lio had .ailed me meeting to consider the proposal to levy a tax of 2d -in the pound .m ail dairy produce exported’. The matter had been discussed with the Minister-tor Agriculture, and the Board of ’1 rado .had recommended that the ' retail price of butter should not be moro loan J s 7d per lb and the export .united to Is 9d per B>. About yO.OUt) tons of butter were manufactured eaeh year ami: 20,000 lotus were exported. ■ leaving 10,000 lons lot' local consu-u/p-UOll. Tlie proposal was to Fix the exported article and put the proc©d.s in a, land to bring the Js 7d pri-v up to | the Is 9d price, the resident- oi cities thus getting as.sistauce at tin- expense ' of the ■ dairy-farmer. In 1912 three cow., could bo bought lor tlio price ol ‘ one in 1910. Land had increased in ' value 1-50 per cent. In 1912 he got -hi per quart for his milk ;_ now ho got •Idonly. an increase of 25 per cent. It was ridiculous for tho Government to put a- class tax on the workingman a.s every dairy-farmer was one. The ■ dairy-farmers were the hai-dest-worke* men in th© Dominion to-day. (Ap--1 plause). The question was, Mere they going to submit to this taxi The lairest way to levy taxation was to levy a tax on everything exported" ami 1 all would- he treated alike. He moved, “That this meeting of dairy-farmers protects against the action ol the Government in putting an export tax upon dairy province, for the reason tnai it is a- class tax and believes that all clacses of the community should b( I taxed equal to their pos.tiou 111 lite.” j Mr M. Ca.nnody seconded tlie mo- ! tion. I Replying to Air Dumbleton (Ota- | niita) lb© chairman said he believed it bad been decided to put the tax on cheese as well as butter. Mr Duuibleton said the tax amoyii.tI ed -to about hi per cow. ! Mr Kilpatrick supported 1 the urn- | lion, and Mr Munro thought tlio Gov- | eminent, ©houid encourage production i instead of taxing it. ; The motion was carried. | PROTEST FROM INVERCARGILL. i A, meeting of representative* of ! eiiee.-e and butter taetor.ies in Soutli- : land was held at Jnvereargill on Satur- ; day. over t>o delegates being present, : to* protest, against the action of the j Government in regulating tbe price ol | butter. ; It was decided —“That this meeting ; entirely d-sap“iovvv, ot the proposal : submiued by the Board ot I |- ade ; to i limit the .selling price ot butter within j New Zealand and to the principle of i raxing the whole of tlie dairy tanners ! in order to make up tbo diflereuee in j the price between rhe limit, fixed and ■ the current London ■market values, boj cause such eour.se would bo —(a) econoi mically unsound ; (b) a class tax. (e) j au iuterlei-ence wijb tbe utnall tanners, who at p-rese.nt are bearing an enormously increased- cost ol production due to the abs-onee ot many niemlK'rs of their families in the lighting lines, the high price of liilkh - which is necessary to replace .those absent at the lixjnt. and the greatly increased cost of all. farming requi-sites ; the fact that blitter for export is to-day worth From Is 6 ,5-Stl to Is 71<1 f.0.b.. the equivalent of which- for business in the Dominion after meeting distributing and marketing charges is Is ?d per lb wholesale and *1 lsj JOd per lb-retail lor best. (|iialities as compared with it eltarge. to consumers in Britain of about 2* per lb. and because' of which an inereasc on the local market is not only justified, but necessary, in the general interests of the industry; that, ill.airy limitation of price is decided as ueees- ! sarv. it, ,i s suggested that the com of | I -sue.il limitation should be a cluirge | i against, the .con-s*)lidiatrtd ■ revenue.' in | l.surpoil. of which wo instance tbe pre-1 eodeut. of the imperial Government with respect to the increased rate ol wagCN to railway.■ workers in Great Britain.” A committee was appoifited to attend to the interests of the factories in connection with ill© matter.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ME19161024.2.17

Bibliographic details

Mataura Ensign, 24 October 1916, Page 4

Word Count
723

TAX ON DAIRY PRODUCE. Mataura Ensign, 24 October 1916, Page 4

TAX ON DAIRY PRODUCE. Mataura Ensign, 24 October 1916, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert