RAILWAYS BILL.

Hawera & Normanby Star, Volume XLII, Issue XLII, 19 October 1922, Page 5

RAILWAYS BILL.

QUESTION OF CLASSIFICATION. j r (.BY TJ3LEGKAPH VRKSS ASSOCIATION.) ! WELLINGTON, Oct. 18. The second reading of the Government Railway Amendment Bill was moved in the House to-day by the Minister of Railways (the Hon. D.. TT. Guthrie). The Minister explained that it was ; designed to give effect in the classifiea- ; tion of the Wages Board's decisions, | and also to provide for the reclassification of railway employees, and to fix a j distance as a basis on which passenger j fares and freights shall be made. The I Bill also provided a penalty up to -£50 ! for misdescription of goods offered for -, carriage on the railway. This was de- ; sired in order to prevent abuse of the I concessions now granted in the carriage of manure and lime for the use of farmers. I Mr. W. A. Veiteh (Wanganui), while agreeing that the Bill conferred cerl tain benefits, hoped other railwaymen's : organisations besides the E.F.C.A. ! would have an opportunity of being ! heard by the Railway Committee before the Bill was passed. He feared the reclassification proposal, however, I was loaded with possibilities of reductions in the increments of pay to men. j The Minister replied that the Bill would not affect increments in any way. | Mr. T. M. Wilford (Leader of the : Opposition) desired that the Minister '■ should produce the existing agreement between the E.F.C.A. and the Government, so that the House could see for itself whether the Bill carried into effect the provisions of the agreement. Mr. H. E. Holland .(Leader of the Labour Party) concurred in this suggestion, and pointed out that the schedule to the Bill showed a slight reduction in wages. The Minister interjected that this was due to the "cut." Mr. Holland said there had been an understanding that no reduction would be made in loco, men's pay, and now they found this Bill providing for a "cut." He considered the Govern- | ment would find Jhis aspect of the I matter difficult to explain. | Mr. H. Atmore (Nelson) supported the demand for the production of the j agreement between the Government and the E.F.C.A. j The Minister said the adjustments proposed in the Bill applied only to the E.F.C.A., and did not affect the I A.S.R.S. or the Officers' Institute at i all. Mr. Guthrie said the officers said ! they did not like the proposals, but in the financial circumstances of the coun--1 try they would not stand in the Gov- \ ernment's way. The A.S.R.S. com- [ plained that some of their ranks had not been paid as well as they should ' have been, and refused to consider the I matter at all. The E.F.C.A. met the ; Government fairly, and expressed willingness to accept a "cut" in wages and 5 forego certain privileges. An agreement embodying these things was entered into between The General Manager and the E.F.C.A. He refuted the suggestion that there was anything discreditable in the relations between tlie Government ans anyone connected J witb the E.F.C.A. I Tie Bill was, read a teeend time,