Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ART UNIONS

HOW MANY MORE ? . DEFINITE LIMIT FIXED NO MINERAL PRIZES AFTER' MARCH. NEXT. V (By Telegraph.—-Special to The Star.) WELLINGTON, June 26. It may seem puzzling to many people that,' while Ministers are declaring that the end of the big lottery is coming in New Zealand; “the'opportunities in this direction have not yet diminished. When will the end-come? This is now definitely ascertained.' The end arrives on March 31 next, whether the existing promises for permits are exhausted or not. '

The Government committed itself to - a series of permits before it decided J to take drastic action for regulation. & These promises have to be honoured, and there are four more left. As the time is limited, there seems to be ail understanding between those who are entitled to permits that each will secure a clear field for a definite period, so as to give .them an opportunity he•fore the end of March. Another feature which has required careful liandling is that the mineral specimen which is ostensibly the prize has to servo one lottery after another, as a specimen of alluvial gold of the large amount needed for a lottery prize is not readily obtainable in the Dominion. But * there is one such lump actually in existence, thus satisfying the terms of the law. W hen it is won in a lottery its cash, equivalent is naid to the winner; and' the specimen is-put up for .a further trial of luck. -- - , . . What would happen it. a winner decided that this unique specimen was worth keeping is an interesting subject for speculation. He might be in the . happy position of “cornering the market.” ~ However, after the Government’s legislation is passed, mineral specimens’ will not be recognised as “works of art.” Another important limitation will be that a prize cannot exceed in value the sum. of

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HAWST19260628.2.53

Bibliographic details

Hawera Star, Volume XLVI, 28 June 1926, Page 7

Word Count
305

ART UNIONS Hawera Star, Volume XLVI, 28 June 1926, Page 7

ART UNIONS Hawera Star, Volume XLVI, 28 June 1926, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert