Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CRICKET.

ENGLISH COUNTY MATCHES, GOOD BOWLING PERFORMANCE. BY CABLE—PRESS ASSOCIATION—COPYRIGHT. LONDON, Alls. 26. The county matches resulted as follows: Surrey, in the first innings, made 209 against Yorkshire. Kilner took] five wickets for 58. Yorkshire replied with 100, Sadler taking five wickets for 29 and Fender three for 7. In the second innings Surrey made 202, the same figure being reached by Yorkshire in the second effort. Rhodes being still in with 51. Sadler took five wickets for 42 and Fender five for 45. Sussex beat Gloucester. For Sussex Gilligan took six wickets for 26 and Tate three for 18. For Leicester Shipman took six wickets for 50.

For Gloucester Hammond made 174 not out and Parker took seven wickets for 30 and seven for 101. including the hat trick, in each innings. Gloucester beat Middlesex, for whom Haig took six wickets for 11 and Dunstan four for 18.

Nottingham beat Warwick. For Nottingham Whysall made 137, while with the ball Barrett and Staples each took four wickets for 51.

Somerset, for whom Mcßryan made 95, defeated Worcester, for whom Foster made 111 and Hunt took five wickets for 51.

For Essex, against Northampton, Freeman made 120, the match being abandoned owing to rain, which generally interfered with play. The Lancashire-Hampshire fixture was abandoned shortly after the start.

A SELECTION CRITICISED. LONDON. Aug. 26. The Daily Chronicle says the selection of Whysall is an insult to English wicket-keepers. To suggest, as the selectors have, that the wicketkeepers are so bad that not- one is worth selecting, is ludicrous. Whysall was not even reserve wicket-keeper for Nottingham.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HAWST19240828.2.45

Bibliographic details

Hawera Star, Volume XLVIII, 28 August 1924, Page 6

Word Count
266

CRICKET. Hawera Star, Volume XLVIII, 28 August 1924, Page 6

CRICKET. Hawera Star, Volume XLVIII, 28 August 1924, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert