(To the Editor- of the Gre>j Mver An/us.) Sir — Being a witness in the case of Hooper .and party v. Beard and party, and. knowing the case to be decided wrongfully, I wish"to show to. the public how Mr Tlevell autedin my case. Iwould not mention it now, as it is nine months since, but ail thiiik Mr R<jvell ought to have had experience enough by this time, and seeing how he acted in the above, of bourse I think it my duty to the .public to let his decision be known. / I bought one fourth share in a claim adjoining M'Kenzie and party, situatel o>j the beach, not far from Greyniouth, ipr which I paid £40, and got a reoeipt for? the same. The seller then went to Melbourne. I was in possession of the said claim riirie ;d;vys arid working, • v/hen the/parties in the adjoining chu m told me the ground was given to them. Hf course I refused to give it up ;. the case came before Mr Eevell, and he decided it ftgainst me. Th ese facts I made known in Court, but of no avail; I shbuld hjiye thought my being working in tlie gronnd, and being seen by the parties for nine days, would be sufficiently clear to any one that I was the rightful owner. . Hoping you will find space in your paper forthis;;'' : / ■'/' ■-/ ■ . ' /•"- --/ ■;■ -. ■'■ -■■ .;',.; '-•:. I am, &c, : ;" // /Wai. Casement.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA18670228.2.8.2
Bibliographic details
Grey River Argus, Volume III, Issue 176, 28 February 1867, Page 2
Word Count
235Untitled Grey River Argus, Volume III, Issue 176, 28 February 1867, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.