Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PARLIAMENTARY SENSATION

MR. ATMORE’S LOBBY REMARK

RESENTED BY MEMBER

(Special to “Star.")

WELLINGTON, August 30. Words exchanged in the lobby of the House after its rising last night, between Mr Samuel and Mr Atmore, induced Mi- Samuel, at this morning’s sitting, to raise ■ the question of a breach of privileg and seek to have the Minister’s allegations fully threshed out. 1 Mr Samuel declared that he had been slandered, by the Minister, Mr Atmore having remarked, in response to a jocular remark that he would tell the people something about Samuel in Egypt. Mr Samuel took this as a direct reflection on his military career, which was open for the world to see. If a Member was insulted by another in the lobby, Parliament would soon become a place unfit to live in. He had his family to consider, and he was not go:, ing to have such an imputation made against him by any member. If the remark I’-'d been made outside the House he would know how to deal with it. Mr Atmore referred to the charge of literary piracy made against him by Mr Samuel on the previous evening, and was promptly called to order by the Speaker. Mr Atmore’s version of the incident in the lobbv was that he had remarked “Hullo, Samuel,” whereupon Mr Samuel replied : “Don’t be too hard on me when you reply.” Mr Atmore said he had replied, cbaffingly : “I will tell you. something about Egypt.” He described Mr Samuel’s motion as simply a. party trick. It would take more than Mr Samuel to frighten him either inside or outside the House. The Minister said he had said nothing slanderous. He had nothing to retract. A lehgthy discussion ensued, in the course of which it was said that the Minister had aggravated his offence by suggesting that if Mr Samuel knew of something in Egypt, that he was not proml of, he (Atmore) did not.. An amendment was carried for the adjournment of the debate until Tuesday, to enable the Members concerned to'have time to adjust their difference, if possible.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GEST19290830.2.22

Bibliographic details

Greymouth Evening Star, 30 August 1929, Page 5

Word Count
348

PARLIAMENTARY SENSATION Greymouth Evening Star, 30 August 1929, Page 5

PARLIAMENTARY SENSATION Greymouth Evening Star, 30 August 1929, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert