Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SINGAPORE BASE

ITS CONSTRUCTION ” A MAJOR BLUNDER” MR WARD PRICE CONDEMNS PROJECT (British Official Wireless.) Press Association —By Telegraph—Copyright LONDON, February 2. Mr Ward Price, in an article in the ‘ Daily Mail,’ points out that £6,500,000 was expended on “ the Empire’s costliest white elephant,” the Singapore naval base, and that four more millions will go the same way in the next three years. “ Britain,” he writes, “ while her own unemployed stand idle, maintains 3,000 coolies to transform jungle backwaters into a harbour requiring 8,000,000 cubic yards of excavation, 5,000,000 cubic yards of dredging, and 1,000,000 cubic yards of concrete for a mile long granite-faced waterfront where the Navy’s three most powerful ships may come 8,000 miles for repairs in a £1,200,000 floating dock, while crews, numbering 1,300 apiece, swelter in barracks. The only foreign warships within 2,500 miles are a few old Dutch gunboats at Java and an occasional American at Manila. The base owes its existence to fantastic fearfulness such as led Lewis Carroll’s White Knight to keep a rat trap on his horse’s back. Even in the event of an Anglo-Japanese war, no Government would send a battle fleet to the other end of Asia, risking a thrust at the Empire’s heart by European nations. A British naval offensive in Japanese waters would demand a threefold superiority in the fleet, and could not protect Australia because the Japanese route thither would be 4,000 miles farther east. Australia, for a fraction of the cost of Singapore, could be equipped with an air force capable of destroying hostile warships and transports 500 miles from the coast. The construction of Singapore was a nuyor blunder which Japan regards with resentment.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19350204.2.64

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 21945, 4 February 1935, Page 9

Word Count
279

SINGAPORE BASE Evening Star, Issue 21945, 4 February 1935, Page 9

SINGAPORE BASE Evening Star, Issue 21945, 4 February 1935, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert