Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TRAMWAYS DISPUTE: NO AGREEMENT.

PARTIES GO TO COURT. On the resumption of the Conciliation Court in the dispute Otago Tramways Union v. Dunedin City Corporation, it was quickly evident that no settlement was possible, and the matter was referred to the Arbitration Court. This means that in court each party will seek to obtain its original demands—the employers the terms of the present award, and the men the demands published at the beginning of the report on another page, Is increase a day all round. The Conciliation Commissioner (Mr Triggs) expressed the opinion that the employers’ representatives had met the union most fairly, and he only hoped the latter would not be sorry when they got their; award* ■

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19150826.2.70

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 15892, 26 August 1915, Page 10

Word Count
118

TRAMWAYS DISPUTE: NO AGREEMENT. Evening Star, Issue 15892, 26 August 1915, Page 10

TRAMWAYS DISPUTE: NO AGREEMENT. Evening Star, Issue 15892, 26 August 1915, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert