Article image
Article image
Article image
This article displays in one automatically-generated column. View the full page to see article in its original form.


Sir, —I was somewhat surprised, on reading a letter signed -'George S. Thomson" iuyour issue of Saturday, to notice a refection oast as to the "treatment be received at my hands as chairman of his meeting at 'Ravcnabourne. I therefor* beg to encroach on your space to reply. In'the first place, I attended _ the- meeting simmv to hear him espound his views, and as AIV Thomson iuxd not arranged for a .-hainiian. 1 reluctantly agreed to preside at. his request, at.d 01". the vote of those present, but before doing 60 I let Mr

Thomson clearly understand that I was ruoporting one of bis opponents, and in order to avoid any misunderstanding also explained this to the meeting, but asked on his behalf a fair and impartial bearing, which I am pleased to state he received. At the conclusion of his address and by his invitation several questions wore asked, and eventually I inquired if any of those present were prepared to move a motion., when Mr Kellett moved one, which I noticed published in a letter by him in your columns. I was, however, forced, whilst Mr Kellett -was speaking, to request Mr Thomson to keep order, and later allowed the candidate to make an explanation, in which he informed the meeting that he had Messrs Breen's and Ilaymcs's authority to state that ths Labor party were not endorsing the candidature of any of tho candidates in Chalmers, and he also intimated that he was not associated with organised Labor, but strictly an Independent. I then suggested and Mr Kellett agreed to withdraw his motion and move one of thanks only. I certainly did not say that what Mr Thomson had stated in regard to the attitude of the Labor party and the Chalmers electorate was correct, a 6 I was not cognisant of their decision at that time, but I have since learned that the Labor party have agreed to support the Liberal nominee, Mr H. E. Holler. I regret that I have felt called upon to enter into a Press controversy, but I don't think Mr Thomson should" have attacked me, after having prevailed upon me to preside, and having moved a vote of thanks to ime for so doing.—l am, etc., Tete Chahuiax. November 12.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

Bibliographic details

THE CHALMERS ELECTION., Issue 15648, 12 November 1914

Word Count

THE CHALMERS ELECTION. Issue 15648, 12 November 1914

  1. New formats

    Papers Past now contains more than just newspapers. Use these links to navigate to other kinds of materials.

  2. Hierarchy

    These links will always show you how deep you are in the collection. Click them to get a broader view of the items you're currently viewing.

  3. Search

    Enter names, places, or other keywords that you're curious about here. We'll look for them in the fulltext of millions of articles.

  4. Search

    Browsed to an interesting page? Click here to search within the item you're currently viewing, or start a new search.

  5. Search facets

    Use these buttons to limit your searches to particular dates, titles, and more.

  6. View selection

    Switch between images of the original document and text transcriptions and outlines you can cut and paste.

  7. Tools

    Print, save, zoom in and more.

  8. Explore

    If you'd rather just browse through documents, click here to find titles and issues from particular dates and geographic regions.

  9. Need more help?

    The "Help" link will show you different tips for each page on the site, so click here often as you explore the site.