Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
This article displays in one automatically-generated column. View the full page to see article in its original form.

SOLICITOR ON TRIAL

[Per United Press Association.] CimiRTCmrRCH. Xovemher 4. In the Supreme Court to-day Thomas Maude, solicitor, defended by Mr Skerrett, ■pleaded not guilty to a charge of the theft of £I,OOO from Elizabeth 'Barnett. An application for more details in regard to the charge was made by Mr Skorrett, but ■was held over, His Ilorior savins that the depositions in the meantime gave the details the Crown relied en. Barnett stated that £1,500 was given to Maude and Harman in 1908 to invest on first mortgage. The interest fell in arTe&r* in 1912, and he asked Maude to sell up the mortgagor. Ho said he would rather not. Witness saw another firm of soHcitor». and discovered that the deeds said by Mauds to have been lodged in the bank were not there. Maude paid £6OO, but -when pressed by the solicitor he said. he could not pay the remainder. Cross-examined. Barnett said that on March 19, 1908, he lent the firm of Mande and Harman £I.BOO on call at 6 per cent., and £1,500 was subsequently placed in Maude's hands for Mrs Barnett. It was clearly understood that this was for investment. In 1909 £1,093 was paid off th« £I,BOO debt, nnd the balauc* (principal and interest) in 1910.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19141105.2.9

Bibliographic details

SOLICITOR ON TRIAL, Evening Star, Issue 15642, 5 November 1914

Word Count
211

SOLICITOR ON TRIAL Evening Star, Issue 15642, 5 November 1914

Working