MAGISTRATE’S COURT. (Before E. H. Carew, Esq., S.M.) Postlethwaite and another v. the Sew Hoy Big Beach Gold Mining Company.—Claim, £25 ss, for goods delivered.' Mr Wood, house appeared for the plaintiff and Mr Sim for the defendant company. In this previously-heard case His Worship gave judgment as fallows j The first question Is whether. Mr M'Qeorge and Mr Payne had implied authority to order the goods, the price -of which is now. sued for, on behalf of the defendant company. The resolution of directors of December 14, 1898, authorised Messrs Gore and Leo to seo Mr M'Qeorge ns to the best scheme and arrange to carry the workout. The evidence shows that subsequently these gentlemen met. that Mr M'Qeorge invited tenders *“8 machinery and works required, that the plaintiffs sent a written tender addressed to Messrs M George and Payne, that this tender was placed before the directors on the 13th January, that Mr M'Qeorge attended the meeting, and the minute book shows that it was resolved that the New Zealand Engineering and Electrical Company s tender for £329 15s be accepted, and the alterations be made on No. 3 dredge. On the same date the plaintiffs received a letter from Mr M George, in which he wrote; “ I have been instructed to accept your tender,” etc. Mr Stevenson says that the plaintiffs had no communication with the directors on the matter. The whole transaction, therefore, a comparatively large order, was conducted on defendant's behalf by Mr M George, and I think from that, and the apparent necessity there is that orders for engineering work must be conveyed through an engineer, justified the plaintiffs in considering that Mr M George had also authority to bind the company respecting other requirements and details subordinate to the principal work. These remarks apply to the first item of. the Claim ordered uy Mr M'George. The other items were ordered by Mr Payne, who, I presume, acted in place of his then or former partner, Mr M'George. I can see nothing in the evidence to bind the company in respect to Mr Payne. He was never the agent of the company, or placed by the company in a position to appear, to be so. The next point in the case, and this applies to, all the items, is that the defendant, company has possession of the goods. Delivery' was taken at the Dunedin railway station, and the goods carried to the company’s claim at the Shotover, where they now are, some fitted to other machinery and some loose. It seems to me immaterial whether the directors knew that the goods were supplied without their authority or were led to believe they formed part of original contract or not at the time the tinie they removed them. They became acquainted with the facts early in June, but they still retain-the foods and have never offered to return them, and think that upon this ground they are liable to pay. As to the prices, it seems to me that the first item is too high by, say, £3. Judgment for plaintiffs for £22 Ss, with costs of court, witnesses’ expenses (21s), professional costs (£2l2s).
Judgment was given for the plaintiffs, with costs, in the following cases:—Thomson, Bridger, and Co. (Mr Moore) v. D. A. M*Kay, claim £8 18s, for goods supplied; Richard Sampson (the Hon. J. MacGregor) v. Thomas Blue, claim £1 ss, for board and lodging; same v. James Black, claim £1 14s, for board and lodging. John Hughes v, James Gibson.—Claim, £53 10s, as damages for the value of a horse and harness. Mr Fraser appeared for plaintiff and Mr Woodhonse for defendant.— Plaintiff was nonsuited, with costs (£3 13s 6J). Francis Meenan v. George Smith.—Claim, £lO 3s lid, for goods sold and delivered. Mr Gallaway appeared for plaintiff, and Mr I). Stewart (of Balclutha) for the defendant. —After evidence the case was adjourned for a week.
Permanent link to this item
THE COURTS—TO-DAY., Evening Star, Issue 10428, 24 September 1897
THE COURTS—TO-DAY. Evening Star, Issue 10428, 24 September 1897
Using This Item
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.